2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-019-0333-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal volume transmission during non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation via RAM® cannula

Abstract: Background Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a widely used mode of support in neonates, during which ventilator inflations may or may not coincide with spontaneous breathing. Objective We tested the hypothesis that inflations delivered with NIPPV via RAM ® cannula and not accompanied by patient effort produce minimal tidal volume as measured by respiratory inductance plethysmography. Design/Methods Fourteen subjects were monitored while receiving NIPPV. We compared tidal volumes durin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,7,14,18,19 Infants randomized to the RAM cannula versus SBP with NIPPV had increased need for mechanical ventilation at birth, and NIPPV-neurally adjusted ventilatory assist breaths through the RAM cannula had little effect on tidal volumes. 22,23 Our bench study demonstrates increasing transmission of pressures with larger RAM cannula sizes (newborn and infant) and clinicians should take into account the nasal occlusion percentage and the size of the cannula when determining pressures at the bCPAP bottle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…5,7,14,18,19 Infants randomized to the RAM cannula versus SBP with NIPPV had increased need for mechanical ventilation at birth, and NIPPV-neurally adjusted ventilatory assist breaths through the RAM cannula had little effect on tidal volumes. 22,23 Our bench study demonstrates increasing transmission of pressures with larger RAM cannula sizes (newborn and infant) and clinicians should take into account the nasal occlusion percentage and the size of the cannula when determining pressures at the bCPAP bottle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Matlock et al showed a smaller tidal volume was delivered via RAM cannula than that produced by spontaneous breathing while using NIPPV. 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological studies showed that RAM cannula had high resistance 15 , pressure delivered was acceptable with leaks < 30% 16 , and it could not deliver set CPAP levels when applied using the manufacturer’s recommended 60–80% nares occlusion, even with closed mouth and full nasal prong insertion 14 . Matlock et al noted that NIPPV with RAM cannula produced clinically insignificant tidal volumes in preterm neonates between 24 and 34 weeks during non-spontaneous inflations 20 . Sharma et al compared the pressures delivered by three different nasal interfaces (nasal mask, Hudson prong, RAM cannula) on 30 neonates in each group with gestation 28–34 weeks and birth weight ≥ 1000 g in our centre, during this study period 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%