“…Beck et al, 2008;Billerbeck et al, 2006;Grunwald et al, 2010;Marchant et al, 2014;Moore et al, 2011;Riedel et al, 2011;Røy et al, 2008;Santos et al, 2015). Pore water discharge rates calculated for nearby sandy Wadden Sea sediments vary depending on the method applied and the sediment depth considered Moore et al, 2011;Riedel et al, 2010), among which the method most comparable to the model approach applied in our study resulted in lower flux rates (0.97 m −3 per tide and meter of shoreline, which equals~2 m −3 per day and meter of shoreline; Riedel et al, 2010) compared to our study. Due to the high nutrient enrichment in the tidal flat pore waters compared to Spiekeroog beach sediments (Reckhardt et al, 2015), the nutrient efflux from these sediments can, however, be higher compared to the beach site.…”