2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009jc005544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal variations in groundwater storage and associated discharge from an intertidal coastal aquifer

Abstract: [1] We applied a hydrogeological numerical simulation to investigate spatial and temporal variations in groundwater flow and discharge at a well-studied tidal flat margin in the German Wadden Sea. The simulation was forced by high-resolution sea level boundary conditions. Accuracy of the simulation was checked by comparing simulated with measured pressure heads obtained from direct burial pressure sensor measurements. Overall discharge calculated from the simulation for a time period of almost 12 month average… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Beck et al, 2008;Billerbeck et al, 2006;Grunwald et al, 2010;Marchant et al, 2014;Moore et al, 2011;Riedel et al, 2011;Røy et al, 2008;Santos et al, 2015). Pore water discharge rates calculated for nearby sandy Wadden Sea sediments vary depending on the method applied and the sediment depth considered Moore et al, 2011;Riedel et al, 2010), among which the method most comparable to the model approach applied in our study resulted in lower flux rates (0.97 m −3 per tide and meter of shoreline, which equals~2 m −3 per day and meter of shoreline; Riedel et al, 2010) compared to our study. Due to the high nutrient enrichment in the tidal flat pore waters compared to Spiekeroog beach sediments (Reckhardt et al, 2015), the nutrient efflux from these sediments can, however, be higher compared to the beach site.…”
Section: Pore Water Discharge Influences Phytobenthos and Nearshore Wcontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Beck et al, 2008;Billerbeck et al, 2006;Grunwald et al, 2010;Marchant et al, 2014;Moore et al, 2011;Riedel et al, 2011;Røy et al, 2008;Santos et al, 2015). Pore water discharge rates calculated for nearby sandy Wadden Sea sediments vary depending on the method applied and the sediment depth considered Moore et al, 2011;Riedel et al, 2010), among which the method most comparable to the model approach applied in our study resulted in lower flux rates (0.97 m −3 per tide and meter of shoreline, which equals~2 m −3 per day and meter of shoreline; Riedel et al, 2010) compared to our study. Due to the high nutrient enrichment in the tidal flat pore waters compared to Spiekeroog beach sediments (Reckhardt et al, 2015), the nutrient efflux from these sediments can, however, be higher compared to the beach site.…”
Section: Pore Water Discharge Influences Phytobenthos and Nearshore Wcontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In conjunction with high sediment accumulation rates, such events eventually have created similar subsurface zones of high remineralization activity. If the less likely but still conceivable second scenario of aquifer flow holds true, our results would similarly apply to other sites and many other coastal systems (Cooper Jr., 1959;Valiela et al, 1978;Johannes, 1980;Riedel et al, 2010). Akamatsua et al (2009) give an example of how subsurface advection beneath a mangrove forest generates a maximum in organic carbon at depth of 1 m.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, flux 463 overestimation due to advection-driven fluxes is also not likely considering the relatively poor 464 sorting of our stations, in spite of their high sand content, meaning that the sediment was well-465 compacted (Leote and Epping 2015). However, the contribution from submarine groundwater 466 discharge is unknown for this area but has been reported for other regions of the Wadden Sea 467 (e.g., East Frisian Wadden Sea) as having an impact on some nutrient concentrations in the 468 water column (Riedel et al 2010;Moore et al 2011). Even though we have no data to assess its 469 contribution, we expect it to be low when compared to the East Frisian Wadden Sea, 470 considering the smaller intertidal area of the Marsdiep Basin and the low hydraulic gradient 471 generated by the land adjacent to the Marsdiep Basin (Moore et al 2011;Compton et al 2013).…”
Section: Sources Of P To the Western Wadden Sea 439mentioning
confidence: 99%