2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal stress modeling of Ganymede: Strike-slip tectonism and Coulomb failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bottom right, en-echelon structures in the light subdued material found within Transitional Terrain (173°E, 32°N). In Gray the thickness predicted by Equation 8 (c) vs. the prediction given by Cameron et al, (2019) (d). Arrows indicate inferred shear sense assuming a transtensional origin, where bold red lines are features of interests, thin red lines are craters and features outside of the relevant zone, and green lines are scarps (ticks point downslope) (from Cameron et al, (2018), Deremer et al, (2003)).…”
Section: Ganymedementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottom right, en-echelon structures in the light subdued material found within Transitional Terrain (173°E, 32°N). In Gray the thickness predicted by Equation 8 (c) vs. the prediction given by Cameron et al, (2019) (d). Arrows indicate inferred shear sense assuming a transtensional origin, where bold red lines are features of interests, thin red lines are craters and features outside of the relevant zone, and green lines are scarps (ticks point downslope) (from Cameron et al, (2018), Deremer et al, (2003)).…”
Section: Ganymedementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 of Hurford et al (2018) lists η = 10 21 , 10 21 , 10 20 and 10 14 Pa•s respectively for Europa's iron core, brittle ice layer, silicate mantle, and ductile ice layer. Cameron et al (2019) give similar values for Ganymede, whereas Table 1 of Patthoff et al (2019) lists η = 10 28 , 10 22 , 10 14 Pa•s respectively for the core, upper ice layer and lower ice layer of Enceladus. The latter two values actually were chosen from wide ranges previously reported in the literature of 10 19 − 10 26 Pa•s for the upper ice layer and 10 12 − 10 17 Pa•s for the lower ice layer.…”
Section: Variable Initial Conditions and Parameters Across Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We assume a nominal depth of analysis of z = 100 m and a relatively low coefficient of friction of μ f = 0.2. Cameron et al (2019) found that Coulomb failure is not achieved when considering a present‐day eccentricity because the present‐day eccentricity produces diurnal tidal shear tractions (<5 kPa) that are an order of magnitude smaller than the frictional stresses resisting slip (~30–80 kPa for a range of μ f ).…”
Section: Regional Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used for predicting failure on icy satellite faults (Hurford et al, 2007; Nimmo et al, 2007; Smith‐Konter & Pappalardo, 2008). To investigate diurnal stresses, we compute the Coulomb stresses induced by present‐day low, and past high, eccentricities at depth ( z = 100 m increments) by resolving the raw stresses generated by SatStress on the fault plane as a function of the fault orientation, coefficient of friction of ice, and overburden pressure (Cameron et al, 2019). We calculate the Coulomb stress as τc=||τsμf)(σn+italicρgz, where τ c is the Coulomb stress, τ s is the diurnal shear traction on the fault, μ f is the effective coefficient of friction (based on lab‐derived values from Fortt & Schulson, 2007; Schulson & Fortt, 2012), σ n is the normal stress, ρ is the density, g is gravitational acceleration, and z is depth.…”
Section: Tidal Stress and Coulomb Failure Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%