2006
DOI: 10.1130/g22078.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal signatures in a shelf-margin delta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Suter and Berryhill (1985); Morton and Suter (1996); and Roberts et al (2000) showed their studied Pleistocene shelf-margin deltas as fluvial-dominated with some wave-modification. On the other hand, Cummings et al (2006) recorded strong tidal signals on the front of Cretaceous deltas near the Nova Scotia shelf-edge, but showed that this was probably due to the deltas being sited within a shelf-edge embayment. Shelf-edges are probably more likely to be embayed at sea-level lowstand, whereas shorelines on highstand shelf-edges are more likely to be straight and open, and therefore wave-dominated.…”
Section: Wave Influence At the Shelf-edgementioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, Suter and Berryhill (1985); Morton and Suter (1996); and Roberts et al (2000) showed their studied Pleistocene shelf-margin deltas as fluvial-dominated with some wave-modification. On the other hand, Cummings et al (2006) recorded strong tidal signals on the front of Cretaceous deltas near the Nova Scotia shelf-edge, but showed that this was probably due to the deltas being sited within a shelf-edge embayment. Shelf-edges are probably more likely to be embayed at sea-level lowstand, whereas shorelines on highstand shelf-edges are more likely to be straight and open, and therefore wave-dominated.…”
Section: Wave Influence At the Shelf-edgementioning
confidence: 88%
“…There is no way to estimate, even qualitatively, the palaeobathymetry during the deposition of the Chaibasa shale facies, as the succession is of late Palaeoproterozoic age and thus is of devoid of usable fossils. Internal tide deposits are mostly associated with deep sea sediments (turbidites and/or contourites; see Lee and Ogawa, 1998;Cummings et al, 2006;Youbin et al, 2008). Such deposits are continuously reworked by tides and/or waves and therefore, are texturally more mature than the associated deep sea sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By contrast, in the central Sable Subbasin, Missisauga slope clinoforms are typically difficult to resolve because of growth faults and noisy seismic data (Cummings et al, 2006). The Upper Missisauga (Barremian) shelf margin trend can, however, be correlated into the central Sable Subbasin using a combination of seismic, well-log and core data.…”
Section: Regional Seismic Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The channel at the top of the O Marker is therefore interpreted to be a fluvially incised sequence boundary formed during relative sea-level fall below the shelf edge (cf. Cummings et al, 2006). Well-log data shows the channel to be filled with a heterolithic assemblage of sandstone, mudstone, and carbonate.…”
Section: Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%