2017
DOI: 10.1017/aog.2017.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal modulation of ice shelf buttressing stresses

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Ocean tides influence the flow of marine-terminating glaciers. Observations indicate that the large fortnightly variations in ice flow at Rutford Ice Stream in West Antarctica originate in the floating ice shelf. We show that nonlinear variations in ice shelf buttressing driven by tides can produce such fortnightly variations in ice flow. These nonlinearities in the tidal modulation of buttressing stresses can be caused by asymmetries in the contact stress from migration of the grounding line and bat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(87 reference statements)
4
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brunt and MacAyeal (2014), however, used a viscous ice shelf model to demonstrate that neither direct forcing through sea surface slope changes nor indirect forcing through inflow velocity changes was sufficient to explain the relationship between ice velocity and tidal height at the front of Ross Ice Shelf; this model did not investigate the impacts of these forcings on an elastic or viscoelastic ice rheology. Robel et al (2017) developed a viscoelastic ice shelf model and demonstrated that tidal modulation of contact stresses near the grounding line (similar to Tsai & Gudmundsson, 2015) and at bathymetric pinning points is sufficient to explain the phase and amplitude of tidally modulated ice shelf velocities on both Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf (near Rutford Ice Stream) and Ross Ice Shelf (near Bindschadler Ice Stream). They suggested that monitoring ice shelves for changes in how ice velocity responds to ocean tides may help diagnose changes in buttressing due to ice shelf thinning.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brunt and MacAyeal (2014), however, used a viscous ice shelf model to demonstrate that neither direct forcing through sea surface slope changes nor indirect forcing through inflow velocity changes was sufficient to explain the relationship between ice velocity and tidal height at the front of Ross Ice Shelf; this model did not investigate the impacts of these forcings on an elastic or viscoelastic ice rheology. Robel et al (2017) developed a viscoelastic ice shelf model and demonstrated that tidal modulation of contact stresses near the grounding line (similar to Tsai & Gudmundsson, 2015) and at bathymetric pinning points is sufficient to explain the phase and amplitude of tidally modulated ice shelf velocities on both Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf (near Rutford Ice Stream) and Ross Ice Shelf (near Bindschadler Ice Stream). They suggested that monitoring ice shelves for changes in how ice velocity responds to ocean tides may help diagnose changes in buttressing due to ice shelf thinning.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, Doake et al (2002) suggested that currents beneath the Brunt Ice Shelf could be responsible for the tidal signals found there and this idea was explored further by Legresy et al (2004) and Brunt and MacAyeal (2014). More recently, the discovery of an M sf signal far upstream of the RuIS (Rutford Ice Stream) grounding line (Gudmundsson, 2006) 10 has lead to a focus on replicating these observations (Gudmundsson, 2007(Gudmundsson, , 2011Rosier et al, 2014Rosier et al, , 2015Minchew et al, 2016;Robel et al, 2017) and much less has been done to understand the origin of horizontal tidal signals on ice shelves. Makinson et al (2012) suggested that the large high frequency tidal modulation of the Ronne Ice Shelf could be explained by an elastic response to tilting of the ice shelf as tides rotate around the amphidromic point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the grounding line migration may be assymetric (Tsai and Gudmundsson, 2015) resulting in a greater migration upstream during high tide than downstream during low tide (Rosier et al, 2014). This idea of grounding line migration was explored in more detail by Robel et al (2017) who suggested that changes in buttressing arising from grounding line migration could explain 30 observations on RuIS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed suite of temporal, magnitude and migration features provides strong 267 constraints for modelling. Our model is based on an assumption that the observed cryogenic 268 events result from basal stick-slip motion of the ice shelf on a localized grounding feature 269 (ice shelf pinning point in e.g., Robel et al, 2017), as shown in the schematic plot of Fig. 5a.…”
Section: Model Setup 266mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g.,Padman et al, 2018). Although GPS measurements at a distance of ~ 30 km(Kohler 473 and Langley, 2016), closer to the Kupol Moskovskij ice rise, show a good fit to the tidal 474 model (~ 10 -15 min phase deviations), discrepancies from actual bathymetry might be 475 more pronounced at the source region Robel et al (2017). consider phase lags between 476 measured horizontal ice-displacement variations and tidal heights as indicators of stress 477 variations, in settings where ice shelf/sheet grounding occurs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%