1988
DOI: 10.1016/0019-1035(88)90001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal dissipation, surface heat flow, and figure of viscoelastic models of Io

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
298
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
298
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper and lower boundaries correspond to the base of a crust/lithosphere and the top of a relatively highviscosity, chemically denser mantle, respectively, and are thus assumed to be rigid and isothermal (top) or zero flux (bottom). Because of variations in suflhce temperature and likely variations in crust/lithosphere thickness the upper (isothermal) boundary condition is only an approximation, but it is thought to be reasonable because in rigid lid convection the top of the convecting region is defined by a particular viscosity hence isotherm [Moresi and Solomatov, 1995;Solomatov, 1995]; furthermore, the effects of the huge horizontal variation in internal heating rate are likely to swamp any effects due to horizontal variation in thermal boundary condition An aspect ratio of 15 is chosen for most of the cases, which for an asthenosphere depth of 100 km approximately corresponds to 1/8 the distance around Io, which is the smallest distance between minima and maxima of the asthenosphere tidal dissipation function [Segatz et al, 1988]. The actual effective aspect ratio could be much higher than this if the asthenosphere is thinner, so larger aspect ratios are also considered.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper and lower boundaries correspond to the base of a crust/lithosphere and the top of a relatively highviscosity, chemically denser mantle, respectively, and are thus assumed to be rigid and isothermal (top) or zero flux (bottom). Because of variations in suflhce temperature and likely variations in crust/lithosphere thickness the upper (isothermal) boundary condition is only an approximation, but it is thought to be reasonable because in rigid lid convection the top of the convecting region is defined by a particular viscosity hence isotherm [Moresi and Solomatov, 1995;Solomatov, 1995]; furthermore, the effects of the huge horizontal variation in internal heating rate are likely to swamp any effects due to horizontal variation in thermal boundary condition An aspect ratio of 15 is chosen for most of the cases, which for an asthenosphere depth of 100 km approximately corresponds to 1/8 the distance around Io, which is the smallest distance between minima and maxima of the asthenosphere tidal dissipation function [Segatz et al, 1988]. The actual effective aspect ratio could be much higher than this if the asthenosphere is thinner, so larger aspect ratios are also considered.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focusing of dissipation near the upper and lower boundaries [Segatz et al, 1988] Time-dependent solutions are obtained using the finite volume multigrid code STAG3D described elsewhere [Tackley, 1993[Tackley, , 1996a …”
Section: Cpkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value for Mercury is Q Mercury < 190, and for Venus it is Q Venus < 17 (Goldreich and Soter, 1966). Observations of Io imply Q Io < 100 (Peale et al, 1979;Segatz et al, 1988), while the Moon lies at Q Moon = 26.5 -1 (Dickey et al, 1994). These measurements indicate a similar order of magnitude for the tidal dissipation function of all desiccated bodies in the Solar System.…”
Section: E4 Tidal Response In Celestial Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although a large atmosphere can play a significant role in the evolution of terrestrial planets (Correia and Laskar, 2003), we ignore their effect here due to the large number of unknowns for an exoplanet. In real bodies, Q is a function of the bodies' rigidity l, viscosity g, and temperature T (Segatz et al, 1988;Fischer and Spohn, 1990). A comprehensive tidal model would couple the orbital and structural evolution of the bodies since small perturbations in T can result in large variations in Q (Segatz et al, 1988;Mardling and Lin, 2002;Efroimsky and Lainey, 2007).…”
Section: E4 Tidal Response In Celestial Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation