1994
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90059-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tick-induced modulation of the host immune response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
56
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations suggest that differences observed in severity of ehrlichiosis among blood inoculated and tick-transmission infected dogs in this study could be due to a dose effect or due to a difference between E. canis strains. Adult female ticks, which were included in other investigations, might also have affected the severity of disease through transmission of larger pathogen numbers or through a more pronounced pharmacological effect on the vertebrate host (Bergman et al, 1995;Stich et al, 1993;Wikel et al, 1994). Regardless of the mechanism(s) underlying the differences in observed clinical signs, these results underscore the relevance of experimental tick transmission in characterization and development of control measures for E. canis and possibly other tick-borne pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These observations suggest that differences observed in severity of ehrlichiosis among blood inoculated and tick-transmission infected dogs in this study could be due to a dose effect or due to a difference between E. canis strains. Adult female ticks, which were included in other investigations, might also have affected the severity of disease through transmission of larger pathogen numbers or through a more pronounced pharmacological effect on the vertebrate host (Bergman et al, 1995;Stich et al, 1993;Wikel et al, 1994). Regardless of the mechanism(s) underlying the differences in observed clinical signs, these results underscore the relevance of experimental tick transmission in characterization and development of control measures for E. canis and possibly other tick-borne pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…(ii) Host response may be disruptive to blood feeding, and salivary immunosuppressors may be produced, as in the case of ticks (11) and the New World sand f ly Lutzomyia longipalpis, which have potent salivary immunosuppressive activities (12)(13)(14). (iii) Allergic host responses may be of interest to the insect, as it may increase blood f low at the site of feeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field conditions are propitious for immune-suppression, which probably explains the abundance and wide distribution of ticks. The incomplete immune resistance established after repeated heavy infestations suggests that ticks were able to evade host immunity with their salivary glands secretion (Inokuma et al, 1993;Wikel et al, 1994). This intense antigenic stimulation favors the suppression of specific immune response to ticks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%