2022
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11050499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tick-Borne Pathogens, Babesia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., in Sled and Companion Dogs from Central and North-Eastern Europe

Abstract: Ticks are important vectors of numerous pathogens of medical and veterinary significance. The aim of the current study was to determine the prevalence of Babesia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in sled and pet dogs from Central and North-Eastern Europe. Neither Babesia spp. nor Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. infections were detected in sled dogs from seven countries (Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Russia and Finland). The DNA of Babesia spp. was detected in 100% of symptomatic and 5.4% of asymptoma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of B. canis in ornate tick populations from the different areas of a single country may differ markedly, as observed in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland [ 97 , 233 , 316 ]. Accordingly, the highest incidence of canine babesiosis (from 5 to 250 cases/1000 dogs) is reported from areas with a high percentage of infected ticks—i.e., in eastern Poland, western Ukraine or southwestern Lithuania [ 212 , 294 , 320 , 323 ]. In the future, it will be important to monitor carefully whether these differences in the prevalence of B. canis between tick foci/populations are maintained, or if prevalence changes with further increases in tick density/population/range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of B. canis in ornate tick populations from the different areas of a single country may differ markedly, as observed in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland [ 97 , 233 , 316 ]. Accordingly, the highest incidence of canine babesiosis (from 5 to 250 cases/1000 dogs) is reported from areas with a high percentage of infected ticks—i.e., in eastern Poland, western Ukraine or southwestern Lithuania [ 212 , 294 , 320 , 323 ]. In the future, it will be important to monitor carefully whether these differences in the prevalence of B. canis between tick foci/populations are maintained, or if prevalence changes with further increases in tick density/population/range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(STAT4, INF-γ, GATA3, STAT6, IL-10, IL-13, SOCS3) was detected in three groups of dogs-in dogs with mild/ moderate and severe babesiosis (groups Babesia 1 and Babesia 2) and in dogs co-infected with B. canis and D. repens (Figs. 1,2,3). The expression of all tested cytokines/factors except for INF-γ was observed in dogs infected only with D. repens.…”
Section: Summary Of Immune Response In Dogs Infected With B Canis D R...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…IL-13 expression was predominant in dogs infected with D. repens, and STAT6 and IL-10 predominated in dogs with co-infections.Babesia canis and Dirofilaria repens are widespread parasites of dogs, with expanding geographical distribution in Central and North-Eastern Europe 1-9 . Babesiosis due to B. canis infection is an emerging tick-borne disease 1,2,10,11 . The most common symptoms of babesiosis are lethargy, fever, anorexia, icterus and exercise intolerance [11][12][13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dogs and horses are among the most popular pets and animals used in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) and are in close contact with children or other vulnerable patients [ 20 ]. Despite the abundance of epidemiological data on canine and equine TBDs [ 14 , 21 , 22 ], specific information on the exposure to zoonotic anaplasmosis and borreliosis from dogs and horses living in contact with vulnerable people is scarce. In fact, the overlap of clinical signs in animals suffering from anaplasmosis or borreliosis with other diseases and the limitations of available diagnostic options often lead to an underestimation of these TBDs [ 7 , 14 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%