Advances in the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781118786796.ch26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tibial Tuberosity Advancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, determination of the amount of tibial tuberosity advancement using the femorotibial tangent as a reference may require advancement to a target PLA of <90° . Apelt et al reported a lesser degree of advancement (10.2 ± 3.7°) required to reach the “critical point” in their study.It has been suggested that the PLA CT measurement is more accurate than the simple tibial plateau angle templating that was originally described . It is interesting to note that there was no correlation between the postoperative PLA and any GRF measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, determination of the amount of tibial tuberosity advancement using the femorotibial tangent as a reference may require advancement to a target PLA of <90° . Apelt et al reported a lesser degree of advancement (10.2 ± 3.7°) required to reach the “critical point” in their study.It has been suggested that the PLA CT measurement is more accurate than the simple tibial plateau angle templating that was originally described . It is interesting to note that there was no correlation between the postoperative PLA and any GRF measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Care was taken to center the radiograph over the joint and to have superimposition of both femoral condyles with the joint close to full extension (∼135°) . The PLA was determined by using the common tangent between the tibial and femoral surfaces at their contact point (PLA CT ) . The surgical procedure was performed as described using commercially available implants (KYON Veterinary Surgical Products, Boston, MA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kemper et al, (2011) relatou em seu estudo 7% de complicações maiores, índice abaixo dos trabalhos prévios que giram em torno de 12 a 20% (HOFFMAN et al, 2006;LAFAVER et al, 2007, STEIN;SCHMOEKEL, 2008;VOSS, et al, 2008;WOLF et al, 2012). Dentre complicações associadas a ATT estão falha do implante, fratura da tuberosidade tibial, luxação medial da patela, lesão do ligamento cruzado caudal devido ao avanço excessivo e lesão meniscal subseqüente (DAMUR, 2005;HOFFMAN et al, 2006;BOUDRIEAU, 2009 A lesão de menisco ocorreu em um estudo, onde sete dos 24 casos com menisco medial intacto durante a cirurgia apresentaram lesão posteriormente (BOUDRIEAU, 2005). É difícil averiguar de forma precisa se a lesão ocorreu após a cirurgia de ATT, se a lesão de menisco foi resultado de biomecânica desfavorável se a lesão de menisco não foi vista na primeira cirurgia ou se a lesão do menisco foi causada por avanço insuficiente da tuberosidade da tíbia após a ATT.…”
Section: Complicações Inerentes a Técnica De Avanço Da Tuberosidade Tunclassified
“…(JUNG et al, 2011). Esta temperatura foi baseada em estudos similares previamente realizados (DENNLER et al, 2006;KOWALESKY;LINS et al, 2009;PARK et al, 2009;ETCHEPAREBORDE et al, 2010;GOH et al, 2010;BUTLER et al, 2011;JUNG et al, 2011 DOVERSPIKE et al, 1993;DUPUIS et al, 1994;CHAUVET et al, 1996;BONFIM;PACCOLA, 2000;INNES et al, 2000;MORRIS;LIPOWITZ, 2001;BOUDRIEAU, 2005;CONZEMIUS et al, 2005;DAMUR, 2005;HOFFMANN et al, 2006;BARAÚNA et al, 2007;TARTARUNAS et al, 2007;STEINS;SCHMOEKEL, 2008;VOSS, et al, 2008;GUERRERO et al, 2009;DYMOND;GOLDSMID;SIMPSON, 2010;BISGARD et al, 2011;KEMPER et al, 2011;STEINBERG et al, 2011). Entretanto é sabido que a avaliação biomecânica pode trazer informações importantes para estudos clínicos futuros.…”
Section: Dispositivo Para Corpo De Provaunclassified