2020
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thyroid Nodules with Isolated Macrocalcifications: Malignancy Risk of Isolated Macrocalcifications and Postoperative Risk Stratification of Malignant Tumors Manifesting as Isolated Macrocalcifications

Abstract: Objective: To determine the malignancy risk of isolated macrocalcifications (a calcified nodule with complete posterior acoustic shadowing) detected on ultrasonography (US) and to evaluate the postoperative American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification of malignant tumors manifesting as isolated macrocalcifications. Materials and Methods: A total of 3852 thyroid nodules (≥ 1 cm) of 3061 consecutive patients who had undergone biopsy between January 2011 and June 2018 were included in this study. We ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, extrathyroidal extension status was not evaluated in this study due to a lack of standardized US criteria. An isolated macrocalcification was defined as an entirely calcified nodule with posterior acoustic shadowing, in which no soft tissue component was identified due to dark shadows on the US image [ 19 - 21 ]. Such nodules were classified as "intermediate suspicion" based on the modified K-TIRADS, "moderate suspicion" (4 points) based on the ACR-TIRADS, and "unclassified" based on the other RSS [ 1 , 3 - 5 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extrathyroidal extension status was not evaluated in this study due to a lack of standardized US criteria. An isolated macrocalcification was defined as an entirely calcified nodule with posterior acoustic shadowing, in which no soft tissue component was identified due to dark shadows on the US image [ 19 - 21 ]. Such nodules were classified as "intermediate suspicion" based on the modified K-TIRADS, "moderate suspicion" (4 points) based on the ACR-TIRADS, and "unclassified" based on the other RSS [ 1 , 3 - 5 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, 998 nodules without nal diagnoses con rmed by surgical or de nite biopsy results (benign or malignant) and 8 nodules with US images of suboptimal quality were excluded. Among the 3826 nodules with nal diagnoses by surgical or biopsy results, 35 with isolated macrocalci cations (entirely calci ed nodules) [16] and 16 simple cysts were excluded because it was not possible to assess the nodule echogenicity. US images of thyroid nodules obtained between March 2017 and December 2019 before biopsy were prospectively evaluated by two radiologists, and 90 nodules that were prospectively assessed by a radiologist who did not review the US images of the retrospective dataset (January 2011 to February 2017) were excluded from the study population.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), 3 types of echogenic foci are potentially linked to malignancy [ 6 , 7 ]: macrocalcifications, punctate echogenic foci, and peripheral rim calcifications (or eggshell calcifications). Macrocalcifications have been reported to carry a mild risk of malignancy, while punctate echogenic foci, which are mostly accompanied by psammomatous calcifications in papillary thyroid cancer, have been regarded with a high possibility of malignancy [ 8 , 9 ]. Nevertheless, the literature on the malignancy probability of rim calcifications has remained controversial [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%