2018
DOI: 10.1002/dc.24119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI‐RADS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR) for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules >1 cm with indeterminate cytology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further sub-analysis suggests that the value of ThyroidPrint® testing is mainly in patients with intermediate-risk TI-RADS nodules, increasing the rate of active surveillance from 20% to 71%. However, this clinical benefit was not seen in patients with either low-risk or high-risk TI-RADS nodules, in which the rates of malignancy can be very low (5%) or very high (95%), respectively ( Tessler et al 2017 , Valderrabano & McIver 2017 , Rocha et al 2018 , 2019 ). Likewise, the presence of nuclear atypia in cytology increases the probability of malignancy up to 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further sub-analysis suggests that the value of ThyroidPrint® testing is mainly in patients with intermediate-risk TI-RADS nodules, increasing the rate of active surveillance from 20% to 71%. However, this clinical benefit was not seen in patients with either low-risk or high-risk TI-RADS nodules, in which the rates of malignancy can be very low (5%) or very high (95%), respectively ( Tessler et al 2017 , Valderrabano & McIver 2017 , Rocha et al 2018 , 2019 ). Likewise, the presence of nuclear atypia in cytology increases the probability of malignancy up to 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Considering NIFTP/TUMP as benign, the RoM was 0% for the very low, 4.3% for the low, 22.4% for the intermediate, and 72% for the high-suspicion categories (Rocha et al 2018). Using TI-RADS ACR, the RoM was 0% for TI-RADS 2, 4% para TI-RADS 3, 22.4% for TIRADS 4, and 80% para TI-RADS 5 (Rocha et al 2019).…”
Section: R4mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considering NIFTP/TUMP as malignant, the RoM was 10% for the very low, 13% for the low, 42.8% for the intermediate, and 80% for the high-suspicion categories (Rocha et al 2018). Using TI-RADS ACR, the RoM was 0% for TI-RADS 2, 14.3% for TI-RADS 3, 38.8% for TI-RADS 4, and 90% for TI-RADS 5 (Rocha et al 2019). Considering NIFTP/TUMP as benign, the RoM was 0% for the very low, 4.3% for the low, 22.4% for the intermediate, and 72% for the high-suspicion categories (Rocha et al 2018).…”
Section: R4mentioning
confidence: 98%