2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-014-0382-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thyroid core needle biopsy: taking stock of the situation

Abstract: Recently, the microhistologic evaluation by core needle biopsy (CNB) has been reported as high accurate to diagnose thyroid nodules with previous indeterminate or not adequate fine-needle aspiration cytology. In addition, sparse data have been reported regarding the use of CNB in other conditions. Aim of this review was to furnish the state of the art of this topic by summarizing published data about the diagnostic performance of CNB in thyroid lesions, and provide an easy to use reference for clinical practic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(122 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These last years, several singleinstitution articles reported the use of CNB as a secondline approach in these thyroid lesions with prior inadequate or indeterminate cytology (49). Data from these papers are interesting and, more recently, this option was included in thyroid AACE/AME/European Thyroid Association (ETA) guidelines and Italian consensus for thyroid cytology (8,48).…”
Section: Core Needle Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These last years, several singleinstitution articles reported the use of CNB as a secondline approach in these thyroid lesions with prior inadequate or indeterminate cytology (49). Data from these papers are interesting and, more recently, this option was included in thyroid AACE/AME/European Thyroid Association (ETA) guidelines and Italian consensus for thyroid cytology (8,48).…”
Section: Core Needle Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses also suggested different opinion [32][33][34]. One meta-analysis, which included only five articles, concluded that FNA and CNB do not differ significantly in terms of their sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing thyroid cancer [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the included studies were heterogeneous and with different inclusion and diagnostic criteria for diagnosing malignancy and the patients in two of these studies partially overlapped [15,35]. Trimboli et al [33] concluded that CNB has been reported as more accurate than FNA for diagnosing thyroid nodules, especially thyroid nodules with previously reported inadequate or indeterminate cytology. Yoon et al [34] reported that CNB may have a complementary role, not an alternative role, to FNA, especially for nodules with an inconclusive diagnosis as it provides a definite diagnosis that helps triage patients who require surgery and thereby minimizes the number of unnecessary invasive procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Galectin-3 panel was applied on several cytologic preparations (i.e., cell block or liquid-based) from nodule's aspiration [6][7][8], these markers have not been investigated in thyroid microhistologic samples from core needle biopsy (CNB). By CNB samples, a large percentage of nodules that are read as indeterminate at FNAC may be re-assessed as diagnostic, with high tolerability and good comfort for patients [9]. Then, CNB has been recently described as an accurate complementary test in those thyroid lesions with prior not conclusive FNAC [10][11][12][13][14], and is included in current guidelines for those nodules with prior inadequate cytologic report [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%