2018
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thurston’s boundary for Teichmüller spaces of infinite surfaces: the length spectrum

Abstract: Abstract. Let X be an infinite geodesically complete hyperbolic surface which can be decomposed into geodesic pairs of pants. We introduce Thurston's boundary to the Teichmüller space T (X) of the surface X using the length spectrum analogous to Thurston's construction for finite surfaces. Thurston's boundary using the length spectrum of X is a "closure" of projective bounded measured laminations P M L bdd (X), and it coincides with P M L bdd (X) when X can be decomposed into a countable union of geodesic pair… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now establish that α n does not converge to α in the uniform weak* topology if the above conditions are satisfied. (20) and (17)…”
Section: A Counter-example To Uniform Weak* Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We now establish that α n does not converge to α in the uniform weak* topology if the above conditions are satisfied. (20) and (17)…”
Section: A Counter-example To Uniform Weak* Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liouville embedding L is in fact a homeomorphism of T (D) onto its image in C(D) equipped with the uniform weak* topology, see [MŠ12,Šar15]. As a set Thurston boundary of T (D), which is denoted by ∂ ∞ T (D), is defined as the collection of asymptotic rays to L (T (D)) in C(D).…”
Section: An Easy Calculation Shows That For a Box Of Geodesicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is therefore of interest to understand the space M L b (X) of bounded measured lamination on the hyperbolic surface X. We restrict our attention to surfaces X with bounded pants decompositions (for the definition see [37], [1], [36] and Section 7) where the question is more tractable. We prove (see Theorems 7.4, 8.6 and 9.4) Theorem 1.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%