1986
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<1945:tctdai>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thunderstorm Cloud Top Dynamics as Inferred from Satellite Observations and a Cloud Top Parcel Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cirrus plumes above the anvil level as described by Setvák et al (2007), for instance, may have a strong influence on the shape of cold U/warm center structures. Our explanation for the formation of the cold U/warm center structure based on small-scale mixing processes is in good agreement with the thunderstorm cloud top dynamics presented by Schlesinger (1984) and Adler and Mack (1986). The finding that the observed structure was due to dynamic rather than radiative effects supports results from studies of regular convection that showed a dominant role of dynamic effects in forming cold U/warm center structures (Wang et al, 2002a,b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cirrus plumes above the anvil level as described by Setvák et al (2007), for instance, may have a strong influence on the shape of cold U/warm center structures. Our explanation for the formation of the cold U/warm center structure based on small-scale mixing processes is in good agreement with the thunderstorm cloud top dynamics presented by Schlesinger (1984) and Adler and Mack (1986). The finding that the observed structure was due to dynamic rather than radiative effects supports results from studies of regular convection that showed a dominant role of dynamic effects in forming cold U/warm center structures (Wang et al, 2002a,b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Based on these observational results, and the simulation of the Chisholm pyroCb presented here, we infer that the warm center originated from subsidence and mixing of stratospheric air masses induced by gravity wave activity. This explanation is in good agreement with those proposed in earlier studies by Adler and Mack (1986) and Schlesinger (1984). This paper is structured as follows: In the next section, observations of the Chisholm pyroCb are presented.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the literature there are several observations of turrets reaching this altitude (Alcala and Dessler, 2002;Adler and Mack, 1986;Ebert and Holland, 1992;Simpson et al, 1993). As shown in Sect.…”
Section: Turret Altitudementioning
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, deep convective penetration into the TTL happens occasionally (Alcala and Dessler, 2002;Adler and Mack, 1986;Ebert and Holland, 1992;Simpson et al, 1993;Knollenberg et al, 1993), but it is unclear what the role of such events is with respect to dehydration of air entering into the stratosphere. Radiometer measurements Wu et al (2005) show that convectively lofted ice particles contribute significantly to the total water content at the tropical cold point, and evidence for convection as source of stratospheric water has been derived from measurements of deuterated water in the TTL in e.g.…”
Section: How Suchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties notwithstanding, it is essential to be able to make accurate and timely forecasts of these storms in order to save lives and mitigate property losses. Satellite imagery can help the forecaster in this process by providing indications of where a thunderstorm or group of thunderstorms might form, identifying factors affecting storm evolution, furnishing clues regarding severe weather potential, and hinting as to how the storms(s) might propagate (Adler and Fenn 1979;McCann 1983;Scofield and Purdom 1986;Heymsfield and Blackmer 1988;Bunkers et al 2000;Weaver et al 2002). In particular, storm-scale cloud features on the order of 1-10 km are resolved in 1-km visible satellite imagery and have been shown to be influential in storm evolution (Lemon 1976;Weaver et al 1994;Weaver and Purdom 1995;Weaver and Lindsey 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%