2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Biomechanical Simulation Study of Four Static Reconstructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, cast immobilization for 4 to 6 weeks in an acute injury was recommended regardless of the stability of the MCPJ [4,27]. Currently, most authors have agreed with Stener opinion that 75% of the cases will fail to heal when there is complete rupture of the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb [10,13,24,33] though Pichora et al in 1989 reported very good results with bracing. Limitations of this study, however, are 25% dropout rates, and at some cases, a 3-month immobilization [30].…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, cast immobilization for 4 to 6 weeks in an acute injury was recommended regardless of the stability of the MCPJ [4,27]. Currently, most authors have agreed with Stener opinion that 75% of the cases will fail to heal when there is complete rupture of the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb [10,13,24,33] though Pichora et al in 1989 reported very good results with bracing. Limitations of this study, however, are 25% dropout rates, and at some cases, a 3-month immobilization [30].…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this procedure did not restore stability to volar translation and abnormal supination at the MCP joint past 60°and 45°of flexion, respectively. Lee et al 19 biomechanically compared the results of triangular (apex distal and proximal), figure-of-eight, and rectangular free tendon graft reconstructions and noted that all methods resulted in a stable MCP joint to valgus loading in 0°and 30°without any significant differences between methods. However, only the apex proximal configuration restored range of motion similar to that of a normal MCP joint, whereas the other configurations resulted in decreased range of motion.…”
Section: Static Stabilization (Tendon Graft Reconstruction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [48] demonstrated that this was the only configuration to restore range of motion in the plane of flexion and extension comparably to the uninjured side. Furthermore, Hogan et al [49] demonstrated that whilst no reconstruction could fully replicate the strength of an uninjured UCL, the triangular configuration with a proximal apex using an interference knot fails at a much higher moment than the other configurations thereby providing the strongest reconstruction.…”
Section: Operative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%