Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s18-1063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THU_NGN at SemEval-2018 Task 2: Residual CNN-LSTM Network with Attention for English Emoji Prediction

Abstract: Emojis are widely used by social media and social network users when posting their messages. It is important to study the relationships between messages and emojis. Thus, in SemEval-2018 Task 2 an interesting and challenging task is proposed, i.e., predicting which emojis are evoked by text-based tweets. We propose a residual CNN-LSTM with attention (RCLA) model for this task. Our model combines CNN and LSTM layers to capture both local and long-range contextual information for tweet representation. In additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Çöltekin and Rama (2018) shows that SVM is better in emoji prediction than using bi-directional RNN. Wu et al (2018) incorporated sentiment information in their neural models, and obtained small improvements in terms of overall F 1 -score over the baseline models that do not use sentiment information. Barbieri et al (2018b) explores another metric, called coverage error, to account for the fact that some emojis are quite synonymous to each other (e.g., and ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çöltekin and Rama (2018) shows that SVM is better in emoji prediction than using bi-directional RNN. Wu et al (2018) incorporated sentiment information in their neural models, and obtained small improvements in terms of overall F 1 -score over the baseline models that do not use sentiment information. Barbieri et al (2018b) explores another metric, called coverage error, to account for the fact that some emojis are quite synonymous to each other (e.g., and ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%