THU0542 Evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasound guided epidural corticosteroid injection and pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in chronic low back pain

Tabra, S. A. A.; Elsergany, Mervat; Mowafy, M.E.; Khallaf, H.; Elsharnopy, G.

doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.2069

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, [23] compared the effect of epidural injection (ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone with 2 ml of 2% lidocaine and 20 ml of 9% normal saline; two injections with one-week interval) in treatment of patients with chronic discogenic LBP with or without radicular pain versus conservative treatment with pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. Both groups followed an exercise program.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Conservative Measures in Treatment of Chronic Axial Low Back Pain, A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Shafshak

Fakhry

Abdelfadil

et al. 2022

EJMED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a very common disorder with various management strategies. There is still debate regarding treatment alternatives for axial CLBP. This study aimed to compare the effect of epidural steroid injection (ESI), interferential current (IFC) therapy and core strengthening exercises in a prospective randomized controlled manner. Hence, sixty patients complaining of axial CLBP were included and randomly assigned into either a group of ESI and exercises (group A) or IFC and exercises (group B) or exercises only (group C); each group was of 20 patients. Outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) for function and Beck's depression inventory (BDI) for depression, assessed at baseline and 3-, 6- and 12-week follow-ups. At the start of the study, there were no significant differences between the three groups in age, gender, cause and duration of CLBP, body mass index, abdominal muscle power, muscle spasm or tenderness (p > 0.05). Significant improvement in VAS and ODI at 3-, 6- and 12-weeks was observed compared to baseline assessment in the three studied groups. The improvement was higher for group A compared to B and C. BDI was significantly improved in group A and C at 3 weeks, and in all groups at 6- and 12-weeks compared to baseline. However, at the end of the study, there was no significant difference in the BDI between the three groups. From this study and over a period of 3 months, all studied groups showed improvement in pain, function, and depression but the group who received epidural steroid injection with core strengthening exercises was statistically better than the other two groups, with significant improvement in pain and function, but not in depression. Early effective assessment and dealing with depression, even prophylactic treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy should be addressed. Trial registration: The Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) identification number is PACTR201901523042787 on 16 January 2019.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%