2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2005.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrust-fault growth and segment linkage in the active Ostler fault zone, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
145
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
18
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the faults increase their length during repeated earthquakes (Jackson and Leeder 1994), the long faults in the study area were formed during long period of seismic activity. As stated previously some faults in the study area are segmented, and then the faults increase their length by coalescing of neighboring segments by local earthquakes (see also Gillespie et al 1992;Davis et al 2005). The correlation between the paleostresses and the present-day ones (Tables 3 and 6) shows that there is a change in tectonic conditions and stress states.…”
Section: Exhumed Fault Scarps and Drainage Modification -Neotectonicssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Since the faults increase their length during repeated earthquakes (Jackson and Leeder 1994), the long faults in the study area were formed during long period of seismic activity. As stated previously some faults in the study area are segmented, and then the faults increase their length by coalescing of neighboring segments by local earthquakes (see also Gillespie et al 1992;Davis et al 2005). The correlation between the paleostresses and the present-day ones (Tables 3 and 6) shows that there is a change in tectonic conditions and stress states.…”
Section: Exhumed Fault Scarps and Drainage Modification -Neotectonicssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The first step is to identify planetary landforms that can confidently be interpreted as having formed by deformation. Tanaka et al (2010) review the main criteria for recognizing and interpreting planetary structures such as faults that are comparable to those used by field geologists and geologic mappers in their interpretation of outcrops, aerial and satellite images, and topographic data (e.g., Davison, 1994;Schultz, 1999;Peacock, 2002;Davis et al, 2005;Nemčok et al, 2005;Cunningham and Mann, 2007). The type of fault is deduced from the nature of its displacement field (e.g., Pollard and Segall, 1987), which is related to its kinematics; all three main types of faults (normal, strike-slip, and thrust) have long been recognized in planetary images of various solar system objects (see Strom, 1972;Masursky et al, 1978;Schultz, 1976;Wilhelms, 1987;Tanaka et al, 2010).…”
Section: Interpretation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Displacement-to-length ratios are typically 6.0 Â 10 À3 or 6.7 Â 10 À3 for faults on Mars (Watters et al, 1998;Wilkins et al, 2002) and 6.5 Â 10 À3 for faults on Mercury (Watters et al, 2000(Watters et al, , 2002. On Earth, this ratio is typically between 2 Â 10 À2 and 5 Â 10 À2 over a range of tectonic settings and rock types (Cowie and Scholz, 1992;Clark and Cox, 1996;Schlische et al, 1996;Schultz and Fossen, 2002;Davis et al, 2005). Under-displacement of faults on Mercury and Mars can be attributed to these planets' smaller gravitational accelerations relative to Earth .…”
Section: Displacement-length Scaling On Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Reverse-fault-bounded mountain ranges propagating into a foreland basin commonly initiate either as a single, localized structure which gradually lengthens along strike with increasing amount of shortening, or as several fault segments which eventually coalesce or overlap [Dawers et al, 1993;Cartwright et al, 1995;Davis et al, 2005]. In either case, the active range front likely lengthens as displacement accumulates on the range-bounding faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%