2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10761-012-0181-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Thrown Like Chaff in the Wind”: Excavation, Memory and the Negotiation of Loss in the Scottish Highlands

Abstract: Memory has become an important area of research in historical archaeology over the last decade with an increasing focus on retrieving the narratives of subaltern groups and painful memories of conflict, displacement and loss. Drawing on ethnographic research, I explore how archaeological excavation provides an arena for sharing, negotiating and contesting difficult forms of memory associated with the Highland Clearances. I argue that the Clearances involve a kind of 'postmemory' revolving around a series of ic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These readings take place in relation to artefacts (Colwell-Chanthaphonh and Ferguson, 2006;Mosley, 2010: 68), flora and fauna (Bradley, 2008;Rose, 1996), rock art papers in Brady and Tac¸on, 2016;Norder, 2012), water and watercourses (Langton, 2008: 144-148), fossils (Smith, 2019: 62) and other physical features of the landscape (Alcock, 2002;Basso, 1996;Bradley, 2000;Cruikshank, 2005). Indigenous interpretations of subsurface archaeological and geomorphological features have received far less attention: these engagements are seldom reported and are under-theorised (but see Ballard, in press, 1998;David et al, 2012;Pauketat, 2008; see Jones, 2012;Moshenska, 2007Moshenska, , 2009 for non-Indigenous public interpretations of the subsurface).…”
Section: Imagining the Subsurfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These readings take place in relation to artefacts (Colwell-Chanthaphonh and Ferguson, 2006;Mosley, 2010: 68), flora and fauna (Bradley, 2008;Rose, 1996), rock art papers in Brady and Tac¸on, 2016;Norder, 2012), water and watercourses (Langton, 2008: 144-148), fossils (Smith, 2019: 62) and other physical features of the landscape (Alcock, 2002;Basso, 1996;Bradley, 2000;Cruikshank, 2005). Indigenous interpretations of subsurface archaeological and geomorphological features have received far less attention: these engagements are seldom reported and are under-theorised (but see Ballard, in press, 1998;David et al, 2012;Pauketat, 2008; see Jones, 2012;Moshenska, 2007Moshenska, , 2009 for non-Indigenous public interpretations of the subsurface).…”
Section: Imagining the Subsurfacementioning
confidence: 99%