Throwing Caution to the Wind: National Weather Service Wind Products as Perceived by a Weather-Salient Sample

Abstract

Weather products generated by the National Weather Service (NWS) are crucial for communicating information about weather events. However, it is unclear if the public understands those that exclusively involve wind terminology or the risk posed by nonconvective wind events. To further investigate these questions, we surveyed 373 members of the public from Georgia and Virginia who regularly obtain weather information from two weather blogs in each of the states. Participants completed an online survey designed to evaluate their familiarity with NWS wind products (high wind warning and wind advisory), perceived wind speed thresholds associated with these products, willingness to change plans based on these products, and finally, "weather salience"-the importance participants place on weather information.It was found that our participants scored higher on the weather salience measure compared to previous studies that examined the general public. In both states, these weather-attentive individuals defined high wind warnings (57.5%) and wind advisories (31.8%) in terms of impacts to their daily lives. Respondents also reported that they would be more likely to alter their plans for a high wind watch compared to a wind advisory, providing evidence of a spectrum of understanding about the NWS wind products. Although various NWS initiatives are currently experimenting with the watch/warning/advisory system and impact-based messaging, this study identifies the need to continue and expand this line of research to include all weather hazards (those convective and nonconvective in nature). ABSTRACT (Manuscript

Preparing for Doris: Exploring Public Responses to Impact-Based Weather Warnings in the United Kingdom

“…The approach is also supported by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO 2015). Indeed, studies conducted in the United States suggest that the phrase ''warning'' is widely interpreted as reflecting the anticipated impacts of severe weather rather than meteorological conditions alone (Williams et al 2017). Impact-based (vs phenomena-based) messages have also been linked to greater warning comprehension (Potter et al 2018) and intention to undertake protective behaviors (Casteel 2016(Casteel , 2018Morss et al 2018;Weyrich et al 2018), although these may not always be those recommended (Ripberger et al 2015a).…”

“…Where any warning system with multiple warning levels is implemented, there is an implicit assumption that these different levels will be understood. In the United States, however, it has been found that ''watch,'' ''advisory,'' and ''warning''-each denoting a different status-are often conflated or misinterpreted (Donner et al 2012;Morss et al 2016;Ripberger et al 2015b;Silver 2015;Williams et al 2017). This is concerning as appropriate understanding of these terms has been linked to appropriate action (Morss et al 2016).…”

A climatology of high‐wind events for the eastern United States

“…Black and Ashley () found that from 1977 to 2007, non‐tornadic convective and non‐convective wind events accounted for 49% (1830) of all recorded wind‐related deaths in the United States. Most of these fatalities occurred outdoors, in vehicles, or while boating (Ashley and Black, ; Black and Ashley, ), which may indicate a lack of perception of these events as hazardous by the public (Williams et al ., ). Further, wind causes an estimated 5–10% of tropical cyclone related fatalities in the United States (Rappaport, ).…”

An Exploratory, Preliminary Report on United States Weather Education Trends and General Population Links Between Weather Salience and Systemizing

“…3 One study (Williams et al 2017) sampled participants from two weather blogs and observed men to be higher in weather salience than their recruited women. The BoM (2009) found women more attentive to weather information, but that men checked more often via the BoM website (suggesting the use of / interest in technology as a source of information is increasing the systemizing and, in turn, weather salience, response).…”