Proceedings of GLOBECOM '93. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.1993.318140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throughput performance of transport-layer protocols over wireless LANs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Go Back N however is at best a marginal improvement over Raw Link. These results suggest that conflicting TCP and link layer retransmissions [7] are less of a problem than resorting to end-to-end TCP retransmissions.…”
Section: B File Transfermentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Go Back N however is at best a marginal improvement over Raw Link. These results suggest that conflicting TCP and link layer retransmissions [7] are less of a problem than resorting to end-to-end TCP retransmissions.…”
Section: B File Transfermentioning
confidence: 89%
“…• The TCP application tests suggest that retransmission conflicts between TCP and the link layer [7] are less of a problem than resorting to end-to-end TCP recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Avoiding the violation of transport layer semantics comes at the cost of violating protocol layering, however. The advantages of TCP and link layer coupling is reduced link layer overhead and avoidance of conflicts between local and TCP retransmissions [7], but the scheme may require modifications whenever TCP is modified, and does not work for any other protocols.…”
Section: B Approaches Below the Transport Layermentioning
confidence: 99%