1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(96)80008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Through thickness texture gradients in rolled polycrystalline alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of strong through-thickness variations of texture in our sample is however in agreement with ARB simulation data of Li et al [14] and with predictions of texture heterogeneities resulting from large draught rolling [16].…”
Section: Texture Gradientssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of strong through-thickness variations of texture in our sample is however in agreement with ARB simulation data of Li et al [14] and with predictions of texture heterogeneities resulting from large draught rolling [16].…”
Section: Texture Gradientssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The higher HMS fractions observed both in the subsurface and near the center of the ARBprocessed sample correlate well with expected increase in the amount of shear deformation in the subsurface layers due to large-draught rolling [16,22,23]. Note that the center layer in our ARB sample was the surface layer in the fifth ARB cycle, and thus also experienced a significant shear strain before being subjected to conditions approaching plane strain compression (PSC) in the sixth cycle.…”
Section: Variation Of Microstructural Parameterssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). Similar to the previous experimental results (Hansen & Mecking, 1975) and simulation data (Schoenfeld & Asaro, 1996), the shear texture components were found in the quarter thickness. It appears, however, that the maximum intensity of the {001}h110i shear texture component is slightly shifted from S = 0.5 toward S = 0.72 (Fig.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The fact that ARB produces a more refined microstructure and a higher frequency of closely spaced HABs than conventional rolling is attributed to a greater number of subsurface layers in the body of the ARB sample. These layers experience additional shear deformation, enhanced by the large-draught rolling conditions [25] used during the ARB process. A larger effective strain makes the microstructure more refined and increases the fraction of HABs in the ARB stack [26], which results in its higher hardness compared to the CR sample (see Table 2).…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%