2012
DOI: 10.1109/mssc.2011.2177577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Through the Looking Glass: Trend Tracking for ISSCC 2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing core counts and more pervasive memory-intensive applications, memory bandwidth is expected to become a greater bottleneck in the future [Dean and Barroso 2013;Mutlu 2013;Mutlu and Subramanian 2014]. For the last few decades, DRAM vendors provided higher bandwidth by using higher IO frequencies, increasing the bandwidth available per pin (improving by 17 times over the last decade, from 400Mbps in DDR2 to 7Gbps in GDDR5 [Smith et al 2012]). However, further increases in IO frequency are challenging due to higher energy consumption and hardware complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing core counts and more pervasive memory-intensive applications, memory bandwidth is expected to become a greater bottleneck in the future [Dean and Barroso 2013;Mutlu 2013;Mutlu and Subramanian 2014]. For the last few decades, DRAM vendors provided higher bandwidth by using higher IO frequencies, increasing the bandwidth available per pin (improving by 17 times over the last decade, from 400Mbps in DDR2 to 7Gbps in GDDR5 [Smith et al 2012]). However, further increases in IO frequency are challenging due to higher energy consumption and hardware complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain this historical growth in memory density, SRAM bit cells have been aggressively scaled down physically for every generation along the semiconductor technology roadmap. However, there has been a slowdown in SRAM area scaling from 50% to 30% reduction per generation [Smith et al 2012] due to several challenges such as increased leakage and variability at nanoscale [Itoh 2011;Qazi et al 2011]. This calls for new concepts and technological improvements to meet growing performance demands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing core count and memory intensive applications, memory bandwidth is expected to become a greater constraint in the future [5]. For the last few decades, DRAM vendors provided higher bandwidth by using higher IO frequencies, increasing the bandwidth available per pin (a 17x improvement over the last decade, from 400Mbps in DDR2 to 7Gbps in GDDR5 [32]). However, further increase in frequency is challenging due to higher energy consumption and logical complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high latency of global bitline, DRAM operates at much lower frequency (200 − 266MHz) than its IO frequency[32]. Therefore, the ratio between IO frequency and in-DRAM frequency is same as the ratio between global bitline width and IO width, referred to as Prefetch Size in DRAM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%