The binding of charged ligands benzamidine and diazamidine to trypsin was investigated by using a polarizable potential energy function and explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations. The binding free energies were computed from the difference between the free energies of decoupling the ligand from water and protein environments. Both the absolute and the relative free energies from the perturbation simulations agree with experimental measurements to within 0.5 kcal⅐mol ؊1 . Comparison of free-energy components sampled from different thermodynamic paths indicates that electrostatics is the main driving force behind benzamidine recognition of trypsin. The contribution of electronic polarization to binding appears to be crucial. By computing the free-energy contribution caused by the polarization between the ligand and its surroundings, we found that polarization has the opposite effect in dissimilar environments. Although polarization favors ligand solvation in water, it weakens the protein-ligand attraction by screening the electrostatic interaction between trypsin and benzamidine. We also examined the relative binding free energies of a benzamidine analog diazamidine to trypsin. The changes in free energy on benzamidine-diazamidine substitution were tens of kilocalories in both water and trypsin environments; however, the change in the total binding free energy is <2 kcal⅐mol ؊1 because of cancellation, consistent with the experimental results. Overall, our results suggest that the use of a polarizable force field, given adequate sampling, is capable of achieving chemical accuracy in molecular simulations of protein-ligand recognition.simulation ͉ molecular dynamics ͉ trypsin ͉ benzamidine ͉ force field S pecific recognition of ligands by proteins is at the core of many crucial biological functions and systems such as enzyme catalysis and intracellular signaling. Binding affinity characterizes the strength of such recognition. With the recent advancements in computing, prediction of the binding affinity based on physical principles of molecular interaction has come to the forefront of active research and has been the subject of regular reviews (1-5). All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulation with explicit solvent, coupled with efficient free-energy sampling algorithms, can potentially offer accurate prediction of binding free energies of ligands to proteins (5). Common free-energy simulation algorithms include the double-decoupling method (DDM) and potential of mean force approach (PMF). Free-energy perturbation (FEP), thermodynamic integration (TI), or umbrella sampling can be used to compute free-energy differences in either DDM or PMF. It has been argued that DDM is problematic for charged systems, because the binding free energy is computed as a small difference between two large solvation energies in water and in protein (6). However, the PMF approach does not quantify absolute solvation energies of ligand, which makes it difficult to detect potential problems in treatment of long-range effect and bou...