2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrombus aspiration followed by direct stenting: A novel strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Results of the Polish-Italian-Hungarian RAndomized ThrombEctomy Trial (PIHRATE Trial)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Burzotta et al 58) (REMEDIA trial) Lefévre et al 59) (X AMINE ST trial) Silva-Orrego et al 60) (DEAR-MI study) Chevalier et al 61) (Export study) Sardella et al 62) (EXPIRA trial) Dudek et al 63) (PIHRATE trial) De Luca et al…”
Section: )unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Burzotta et al 58) (REMEDIA trial) Lefévre et al 59) (X AMINE ST trial) Silva-Orrego et al 60) (DEAR-MI study) Chevalier et al 61) (Export study) Sardella et al 62) (EXPIRA trial) Dudek et al 63) (PIHRATE trial) De Luca et al…”
Section: )unclassified
“…In this regard, the use of a mechanical device for thrombus removal or trapping to improve clinical outcomes after p-PCI is attractive, and the efficacy of these devices has been tested in many clinical trials. Although some data, especially those regarding the use of distal protection devices, have failed to show clinical benefits due in part to patient and device selection [48][49][50][51][52][53] , many recent large-scale randomized trials have demonstrated significant improvements in myocardial perfusion 45,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] and the left ventricular function 64,65) in addition to reduced mortality 68) ( 69) . In addition, Burzotta et 70) .…”
Section: Thrombus Aspiration/distal Protection Therapy and Its Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,[12][13][14][15][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] The weighted mean follow-up duration was 3.7±2.7 months. Three trials reported outcomes at both 1 and 12 months.…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2015 revision followed two more randomized trials, (16,17) which, taken together with the earlier trials, were interpreted as showing harm. Figure 2, shows the randomized trials of aspiration thrombectomy versus no aspiration thrombectomy in patients with STEMI, ranked by the size of effects on death (cardiac death used when available) or myocardial infarction (upper part of Figure 2) (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). The confidence intervals for every trial except one (25), cross the line of unity, indicating no clear evidence of benefit or harm.…”
Section: Aspiration Thrombectomymentioning
confidence: 99%