2021
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2021.35.s1.04467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thromboxane A 2 Receptors Contribute to the Exaggerated Exercise Pressor Reflex in Rats with Heart Failure

Abstract: Background Mechanical and metabolic signals associated with skeletal muscle contraction stimulate the sensory endings of thin fiber skeletal muscle afferents. During exercise, stimulation of these afferents initiates a reflex, termed the exercise pressor reflex (EPR), which contributes importantly to reflex increases in sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). In patients and animals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF‐rEF), activation of the EPR contributes to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study was powered only to investigate the effect of ASIC1a blockade within the SHAM and HF‐rEF groups and the across‐group comparisons were left underpowered. Importantly, the available literature consistently demonstrates that, compared to SHAM counterparts, the reflex responses to hindlimb muscle contraction and stretch are exaggerated in the rat myocardial infarction‐induced model of HF‐rEF (Butenas et al., 2020, 2021b, 2021c; Koba et al., 2008, 2009, 2010; Morales et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2003; Smith, Mitchell et al., 2005; Smith, Williams et al., 2005; Wang, Pan et al., 2010). We do report the statistical comparison of the pressor response to lactic acid injection between SHAM and HF‐rEF groups because, to our knowledge, this is the first investigation to report the reflex pressor and RSNA response to a bolus injection of lactic acid into the arterial supply of the hindlimb of HF‐rEF rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study was powered only to investigate the effect of ASIC1a blockade within the SHAM and HF‐rEF groups and the across‐group comparisons were left underpowered. Importantly, the available literature consistently demonstrates that, compared to SHAM counterparts, the reflex responses to hindlimb muscle contraction and stretch are exaggerated in the rat myocardial infarction‐induced model of HF‐rEF (Butenas et al., 2020, 2021b, 2021c; Koba et al., 2008, 2009, 2010; Morales et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2003; Smith, Mitchell et al., 2005; Smith, Williams et al., 2005; Wang, Pan et al., 2010). We do report the statistical comparison of the pressor response to lactic acid injection between SHAM and HF‐rEF groups because, to our knowledge, this is the first investigation to report the reflex pressor and RSNA response to a bolus injection of lactic acid into the arterial supply of the hindlimb of HF‐rEF rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to healthy subjects, activation of the exercise pressor reflex in patients/animals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF‐rEF) results in an exaggerated increase in SNA (Butenas et al., 2021c; Koba et al., 2008; Middlekauff et al., 2004; Wang, Pan et al., 2010) and altered cardiovascular responses (Amann et al., 2014; Ansorge et al., 2004; Hammond et al., 2000; Piepoli et al., 1996; Sterns et al., 1991), which include augmented peripheral (Amann et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2020) and coronary (Ansorge et al., 2004) vasoconstriction. Thus, whereas activation of the exercise pressor reflex in healthy subjects supports exercise performance (Amann, Blain et al., 2011; O'Leary et al., 1999), activation of the reflex in HF‐rEF patients likely contributes to exacerbated fatigue, exercise intolerance and elevated cardiovascular risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%