Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004437.pub2
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism

Abstract: We cannot conclude whether thrombolytic therapy is better than heparin for pulmonary embolism based on the limited evidence found. More double-blind RCTs, with subgroup analysis of patients presenting with haemodynamically stable acute pulmonary embolism compared to those patients with a haemodynamic unstable condition, are required.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
76
8
7
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

Range
2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
75
11
3

Relationship

1
88

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 89 publications

(61 citation statements)
references

References 44 publications

1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…23 Compared with heparin, thrombolytic therapy was not associated with a reduction in death. Similar results were found in the Cochrane collaboration review 25 : death rates and recurrence rates of PE were similar for thrombolytics and heparin, OR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.45 to 1.78) and OR 0.63 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.20) for death rate and PE recurrence rate, respectively (no distinction massive and nonmassive PE patients).…”
Section: Thrombolysis In Normotensive Patients
supporting
confidence: 85%