2020
DOI: 10.1177/1591019920923817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrombogenicity of the p48 and anti-thrombogenic p48 hydrophilic polymer coating low-profile flow diverters in an in vitro human thrombin generation model

Abstract: Objectives The implantation of flow diverters, or stents in general, necessitates the use of dual anti-platelet treatment with typical regimes including aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. This carries an inherent risk of haemorrhage. We sought to compare the thrombogenicity of the anti-thrombogenic p48 hydrophilic polymer coating compared to the standard uncoated p48 flow diverter using an in vitro thrombogenicity assay. Methods Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this hypothesis, initial in vitro experiments by Lenz-Habijan et al 2 showed a significant reduction of adherent CD61 þ platelets on pHPC nickel titanium surfaces compared to uncoated ones, thus paving the way for the development of antithrombogenic endovascular devices. Also, Bhogal et al 10 reported a reduction in thrombogenicity using a p48 HPC FDS in an in vitro model of human thrombin generation. On the other hand, a second investigation by Lenz-Habijan et al, 11 evaluating the effects of implantation of HPC FDS vs. uncoated FDS in rabbit carotid arteries, did not observe significant differences between the two devices with regard to implantation, foreign body response and endothelialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this hypothesis, initial in vitro experiments by Lenz-Habijan et al 2 showed a significant reduction of adherent CD61 þ platelets on pHPC nickel titanium surfaces compared to uncoated ones, thus paving the way for the development of antithrombogenic endovascular devices. Also, Bhogal et al 10 reported a reduction in thrombogenicity using a p48 HPC FDS in an in vitro model of human thrombin generation. On the other hand, a second investigation by Lenz-Habijan et al, 11 evaluating the effects of implantation of HPC FDS vs. uncoated FDS in rabbit carotid arteries, did not observe significant differences between the two devices with regard to implantation, foreign body response and endothelialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently a larger series, including the pCONUS2 HPC device was published. The pCONUS2 HPC device has a hydrophilic polymer coating that has shown reduced thrombogenicity when applied to nitinol [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and cobalt-chromium surfaces [26]. Yeomans et al [16] reported the results of 20 aneurysms, 4 of which were ruptured, treated with the pCONUS2 (n = 13) or the pCONUS2 HPC (n = 7) with all of the ruptured aneurysms treated using the pCONUS2 HPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 37 Similarly, in vitro flow model tests demonstrated that the thrombogenicity of coated p48MW HPC flow diverters was significantly lower than that of uncoated p48MW flow diverters. 30 , 33 In vivo studies have shown that the coating elicits neither an acute nor chronic inflammatory reaction in the arterial walls after implantation with biocompatibility shown across different species (canines and rabbits). 31 , 32 , 35 Of equal importance there was no evidence from these in vivo studies to suggest that the coating impaired neo-endothelialisation and hence the initial in vitro and in vivo results suggested that the coating did limit the thrombogenicity of coated devices but without any evidence of causing either a slowing in the neo-endothelialisation process, that could impair aneurysm exclusion, or an inflammatory reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 , 29 The Hydrophilic Polymer Coating (HPC, phenox, Bochum, Germany) was developed to limit the need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and can be applied to flow diverters as well as other nitinol surfaces. 30 37 This glycan polymer simulates the features of the glycocalyx and thereby limits the thrombogenicity of the coated devices hence allowing the use of SAPT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%