2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver disease – A nationwide register-based cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, despite having a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥2, more than 90% of liver cirrhosis patients included in the study received either no treatment or treatment with a platelet inhibitor instead of OACs. Supporting the Taiwanese study, a Danish, nationwide, cohort study by Steensig et al also reported a benefit of OACs in individuals with liver disease and AF, though only in the case of a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥2 for men and ≥3 for women [79] The authors included a total of 1238 OAC naïve patients with liver disease, newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation, and a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥1 for men and ≥2 for women and compared initiation of OACs with no OACs. Initiation of OACs was associated with significantly reduced risk of thromboembolism, and the positive effect of OAC increased with the rising CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score.…”
Section: Observational Evidence On Oral Anticoagulant Treatment In Pa...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Notably, despite having a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥2, more than 90% of liver cirrhosis patients included in the study received either no treatment or treatment with a platelet inhibitor instead of OACs. Supporting the Taiwanese study, a Danish, nationwide, cohort study by Steensig et al also reported a benefit of OACs in individuals with liver disease and AF, though only in the case of a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥2 for men and ≥3 for women [79] The authors included a total of 1238 OAC naïve patients with liver disease, newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation, and a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of ≥1 for men and ≥2 for women and compared initiation of OACs with no OACs. Initiation of OACs was associated with significantly reduced risk of thromboembolism, and the positive effect of OAC increased with the rising CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score.…”
Section: Observational Evidence On Oral Anticoagulant Treatment In Pa...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a prospective cohort, Pastori et al [ 34 ] confirmed that patients with AF and advanced liver fibrosis, defined on prophylactic treatment with VKAs, have an increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular events, including ischemic stroke, compared with those treated with DOACs [ 18 ]. Until now, there have been no studies evaluating the role of anticoagulant treatment in stroke prevention in patients with AF and decompensated LC, although it has been demonstrated that cirrhotic men with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2 and women with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥3 benefit more from the anticoagulant treatment in regard of thromboembolic events prevention [ 71 ].…”
Section: Anticoagulant Prophylaxis In Patients With Decompensated Liv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of 1238 Danish citizens with new-onset AF and CLD reported that, for patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-score ≥2, 5-year thromboembolism rates were significantly lower in patients receiving anticoagulation (16% versus 24%; average risk ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45–0.87]). 9 Bleeding risks were higher among patients with cirrhotic than with noncirrhotic disease, but this was not significantly affected by anticoagulant status (oral anticoagulation versus none: cirrhosis, average risk ratio 0.72 [95% CI, 0.28–1.15]; no cirrhosis, average risk ratio 1.28 [95% CI, 0.67–1.90]). Similarly, a retrospective analysis of 16 168 patients from Italy with AF and liver disease demonstrated that liver disease was associated with an elevated risk of major bleeding, but oral anticoagulant use resulted in a reduction in risk of stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70–0.92]) and major bleeding (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.74–0.99]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%