1979
DOI: 10.1042/bst0070703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrombic Digestion of Myosin Alkali Light Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with the NMR studies (Prince et al, 1981) and the affinity chromatography studies (Winstanley & Trayer, 1979;, which suggest that the Al light chain, but not the A2 light chain, interacts with actin. Also, it has been recently demonstrated that the Al light chain can be chemically cross-linked to the C-terminal region of actin (Sutoh, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These data are consistent with the NMR studies (Prince et al, 1981) and the affinity chromatography studies (Winstanley & Trayer, 1979;, which suggest that the Al light chain, but not the A2 light chain, interacts with actin. Also, it has been recently demonstrated that the Al light chain can be chemically cross-linked to the C-terminal region of actin (Sutoh, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, it is likely that the N-terminal segment of AL1 binds to actin at and around its acidic residues at positions 360, 362, and 363. Consistent with the above result, affinity chromatography of the thrombic digest of AL1 demonstrated a direct interaction between a fragment of AL1 (residues 1-79) and actin (Winstanley & Trayer, 1979;Henry et al, 1980). NMR studies have also demonstrated that the N-terminal segment of AL1 (residues 1-41) interacts with actin in the acto-Sl rigor complex (Prince et al, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This sensitive site is different from another single site (Arg76-Ala77), cleaved by thrombin in isolated LCl [48]. The ionic concentration effect we have described above requires the filament structure, since varying ionic strength had no effect on LC1' cleavage in S1 and HMM- part from the expected behaviour since their LC1' cleavage exhibits a significant ionic concentration effect.…”
Section: Cleavages In Lc1mentioning
confidence: 97%