“Thrombectomy and Back:” A novel approach for treating patients with large vessel occlusion in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Timely access to comprehensive stroke centers for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a commonly encountered obstacle worldwide, especially in areas with no comprehensive stroke or thrombectomy-capable stroke centers. Objective: To present our novel experience with a “thrombectomy-and-back” model implemented in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Methods: King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), a 600-bed hospital located in Al Khobar with an open-access emergency department, was designated as a comprehensive stroke center in the Eastern Province. “Thrombectomy-and-back” was designed such that the neurologist in the referring hospital directly communicates with the attending neurovascular team at KFHU for their anticipation of the case, and subsequently confirms LVO presence through urgent acquisition of a CT and a CT angiogram. Once LVO was confirmed, the patients were timely transferred to KFHU for mechanical thrombectomy. Upon procedure completion, the patients returned to the referring hospital with the same medical and EMS team. The safety of transfer and peri-procedural complications were analyzed. Results: From December 2017 to December 2019, 20 thrombectomy-and-back codes were activated, of which 10 were deactivated on negative LVO and 10 remained activated. Of these 10 patients, 2 required admission to our hospital's Neuro-ICU: one was because the middle cerebral artery reoccluded during the procedure and the other was due to hemodynamic instability upon arrival; this first patient passed away 2 months later due to the complications of the malignant left middle cerebral artery stroke. Conclusions: The novel Thrombectomy-and-Back model in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia has proved to be a safe and efficient approach for patients presenting with LVO to receive timely interventional therapy and minimizing futile transfers.

Anaesthetic and peri-operative management for thrombectomy procedures in stroke patients

“…More specifically, there exists no study directly comparing the 2 strategies. Only 1 study has reported on 10 cases of post-MT patients, 8 of whom were sent back to the center to which they were initially admitted, while the other 2 were maintained in the center where the MT was performed, due to hemodynamic instability or malignant sylvian infarction, without any outcome having been indicated [102]. As a result, a strong recommendation cannot be issued.…”