2020
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thriving among older people living at home with home care services—A cross‐sectional study

Abstract: Aim To explore the level of thriving and associated factors among older adults living at home with support from home care services. Design An exploratory, cross‐sectional survey design. Method A sample of 136 participants (mean 82 years) responded to a survey about thriving, health, psychosocial and care‐related factors in 2016. Descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis with a stepwise backwards elimination procedure were performed. Result The results showed that the level of thriving was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dimension included taking part in meaningful, enjoyable activities that matched the older people’s interest. As we reported previously [ 11 ], thriving was rated relatively high and the dimension “being engaged in activities” was rated lowest of all dimensions at baseline. The finding that the other dimensions did not improve seems reasonable as a high score at baseline limits the possibility of improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This dimension included taking part in meaningful, enjoyable activities that matched the older people’s interest. As we reported previously [ 11 ], thriving was rated relatively high and the dimension “being engaged in activities” was rated lowest of all dimensions at baseline. The finding that the other dimensions did not improve seems reasonable as a high score at baseline limits the possibility of improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is the first time that thriving, evaluated using the TOPAS, has been used as outcome variable in an intervention study. The scale has previously been used in cross-sectional studies, with comparable values [ 11 , 12 , 45 ], which suggests that the scale has a ceiling effect and may need to be further developed and tested. Furthermore, the period between baseline and follow-up was 20 months, which probably also had an impact on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other aspects of QoL, such as being able to manage one's situation and feeling supported by others, or living independently (Lämås et al, 2020) are therefore important to be included as relevant outcomes of care. These QoL aspects might be improved through care services (author information removed., submitted, Lämås et al, 2020). In short, a broader perspective on QoL seems required in determining quality of care in this context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%