1980
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(80)91031-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold studies of secondary electron emission induced by macro-ion impact on solid surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted here that direct comparison of intensities of small and large clusters is difficult because of the inherent decline in detector response at high masses. For fairly large clusters, the detection efficiency decreases as the particle impact velocity decreases down to a threshold value of ∼ 20 km/s [18]. For the present experiments, the ion impact energy was 5 keV and thus clusters with masses above roughly 2500 u (i.e., at n > 80 for P n clusters) were detected with significantly decreasing efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It should be noted here that direct comparison of intensities of small and large clusters is difficult because of the inherent decline in detector response at high masses. For fairly large clusters, the detection efficiency decreases as the particle impact velocity decreases down to a threshold value of ∼ 20 km/s [18]. For the present experiments, the ion impact energy was 5 keV and thus clusters with masses above roughly 2500 u (i.e., at n > 80 for P n clusters) were detected with significantly decreasing efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast, Tabet and coworkers observed the opposite trend for BSA: lowering the analyte concentration led to a decrease of doubly charged ions in their experiments using a conventional microchannel plate (MCP) detector [22]. The MCP suffers from very low sensitivity for high-mass ions due to their low velocity and saturation effects caused by long channel recovery times [46][47][48]. With increasing sample concentration, more channels are blocked and the saturation effect of an MCP becomes more prominent.…”
Section: Influence Of Experimental Parameters On the Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The transfer of very high densities of transitory and out-of-equilibrium energy into the solid leads to important modifications of the material and/or to the formation of craters independent of the energy range, the mass of the projectiles and the nature of the bombarded surface. [1][2][3][4][5] Crater formation is accompanied by a very high sputter yield, as was first observed by Andersen and Bay. 6 The other de-excitation channels, such as electron and ion emission, have also been studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%