2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23641-9_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold Selection for Ultra-Wideband TOA Estimation Based on Skewness Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the number of samples. The integrator output is then given by  when the received signal is only noise, and (9) It is difficult to determine the threshold directly from the received energy block values, so a normalized threshold is employed which is given by…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…is the number of samples. The integrator output is then given by  when the received signal is only noise, and (9) It is difficult to determine the threshold directly from the received energy block values, so a normalized threshold is employed which is given by…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many TOA estimation algorithms have been developed [9][10] [11][12] [13]. The majority of these algorithms employ either a coherent receiver such as a matched filter (MF), or a non-coherent receiver such as an energy detector (ED).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the SNR increases, S tends to increase. In [6], exponential functions were fit to the skewness results for T b = 1 ns and T b = 4 ns, with S as the x- …”
Section: Skewnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is a very challenging problem due to the severe environments encountered, e.g., thermal noise, multi-path fading, reflection interference, and inter-symbol interference. The TOA estimation problem has extensively been studied [3][4][5][6]. There are two approaches applicable to UWB technology, a Matched Filter (MF) [3] (such as a Rake or correlation receiver) with a high sampling rate and high-precision correlation, or an Energy Detector (ED) [4][5][6] with a lower sampling rate and low complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%