2017
DOI: 10.5336/urology.2017-58683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold Point of the Total Stone Volume Matter on Decision of Flexible Ureteroscopy

Abstract: A AB BS S T TR RA AC CT T O Ob bj je ec ct ti iv ve e: : To determine optimal patients who appropriate for flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) treatment of kidney stones, and the precise cut-off volume value to regard success of FURS. M Ma at te er ri ia al l a an nd d M Me et th ho od ds s: : We retrospectively analysed; 164 FURS procedures for kidney stone treatment between December 2012-October 2016 at our centre. Stone Free Rates (SFR) of the procedure was controlled with Non-Contrast CT (NCCT) at the end of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the possible effects of the parameters as mentioned above on the success rates of FURS, in their original study Ilgi et al mentioned that TSV is the most crucial factor for the management of kidney stones with this modality and their findings showed significantly lower SFR values for calculi with a TSV value of >330 mm 3 . [ 15 ] Although the stone density is a critical issue for the success of SWL; but with the intracorporeal use of Ho-YAG laser, this parameter is no more a major concern for FURS procedure where all types of stones could easily be disintegrated with highly developed laser technology. [ 16 ] However, accumulated experience so far has clearly demonstrated that stone location and anatomical characteristics of the pelvicalyceal system may form specific problems for stone surgery with FURS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the possible effects of the parameters as mentioned above on the success rates of FURS, in their original study Ilgi et al mentioned that TSV is the most crucial factor for the management of kidney stones with this modality and their findings showed significantly lower SFR values for calculi with a TSV value of >330 mm 3 . [ 15 ] Although the stone density is a critical issue for the success of SWL; but with the intracorporeal use of Ho-YAG laser, this parameter is no more a major concern for FURS procedure where all types of stones could easily be disintegrated with highly developed laser technology. [ 16 ] However, accumulated experience so far has clearly demonstrated that stone location and anatomical characteristics of the pelvicalyceal system may form specific problems for stone surgery with FURS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%