1990
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.42.5780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold of ion-induced kinetic electron emission from a clean metal surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
51
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This measurement scheme and representation of the yield are sensitive to the low energy subsurface kinetic excitations that are generated within the metal layer. Prior external measurements of electron emission in this velocity regime 9 indicate a saturated or constant PE signal which should be present within our measured I f values. However, as our measurement was not designed to collect or quantify these external excitations, we make no correction for them in our calculations of ⌫ ie and note that a constant PE contribution would represent a rigid shift in the yield and would not alter the physically relevant KE trend that is observed and discussed below.…”
Section: Rapid Communicationssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This measurement scheme and representation of the yield are sensitive to the low energy subsurface kinetic excitations that are generated within the metal layer. Prior external measurements of electron emission in this velocity regime 9 indicate a saturated or constant PE signal which should be present within our measured I f values. However, as our measurement was not designed to collect or quantify these external excitations, we make no correction for them in our calculations of ⌫ ie and note that a constant PE contribution would represent a rigid shift in the yield and would not alter the physically relevant KE trend that is observed and discussed below.…”
Section: Rapid Communicationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…9,10,[17][18][19][20] For our measurements we can rule out the first two mechanisms as the incident energies employed are too low for close-collision-induced promotion and the projectiles are too simple ͑low Z͒ for multielectron effects to arise. Additionally, no Auger transitions analogous to those seen in previous systems exist for our projectiletarget combinations.…”
Section: Rapid Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…KE has an energy threshold and it is safe to neglect KE for the energy range in the present experiment. 10 Hence, Eq. (5) can be simplified to…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%