1964
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold intensities of thermal radiation evoking sensations of warmth

Abstract: When human skin is stimulated with thermal radiation so that sensations of warmth are evoked, it is most sensitive to radiation with a peak wave-length of 35,u, according to . However, during an investigation of the effects of infra-red radiation on thermal comfort (Chrenko, 1953), discomfort was experienced when the temperature of the source of radiation was only 650 C, so that the skin was more sensitive to radiation with a peak wave-length longer than 3x5 It.Further experiments have been made to determine q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences that we observed between the sexes are an extension of the observations of differences in thresholds for men and for women reported by others (Chrenko, 1964; Fillingim & Maixner, 1995; Fillingim et al, 1999; Kenshalo, 1966; Meh & Denislic, 1994) These differences have been attributed to changes in circulating levels of sex steroids. In rats, ovarectomy and castration have distinct and different effects on the threshold for pain induced by formalin injections (Gaumond, Arsenault, & Marchand, 2002), and one can hypothesize that circulating steroids binding to membrane receptors in the central nervous system are important determinants of neural activity in sensory systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The differences that we observed between the sexes are an extension of the observations of differences in thresholds for men and for women reported by others (Chrenko, 1964; Fillingim & Maixner, 1995; Fillingim et al, 1999; Kenshalo, 1966; Meh & Denislic, 1994) These differences have been attributed to changes in circulating levels of sex steroids. In rats, ovarectomy and castration have distinct and different effects on the threshold for pain induced by formalin injections (Gaumond, Arsenault, & Marchand, 2002), and one can hypothesize that circulating steroids binding to membrane receptors in the central nervous system are important determinants of neural activity in sensory systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The much larger difference between the thresholds for "warmth" and for "change" may help to explain some of the variation among the measured values of the absolute threshold that have been reported from time to time. It is possible, for example, that the Ss examined by Hardy and Oppel (1937) were responding to "change," whereas those examined by Chrenko (1964) were responding to qualitative "warmth. "…”
Section: Results and Discussion Apparent Warmth As A Function Of Levementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements of the absolute threshold for warmth vary from about 0.3 (Hardy & Oppel, 1937) to 1.6 millical/sec x em? (Chrenko, 1964), depending upon a variety of factors, such as the psychophysical method used, the area and location of stimulation, the skin temperature, and the "set" of the S. In order to learn how closely the inferred value. of 1.7 obtained by the iterative method corresponds to direct measurement of absolute sensitivity under reasonably comparable experimental conditions, we now turn to the measurements of the absolute threshold for "warmth" and "change.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Apparent Warmth As A Function Of Levementioning
confidence: 99%