2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24129-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold Determination and Engaging Materials Scientists in Ontology Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, existing ontology infrastructure and knowledge extraction approaches are applicable to materials science. In fact, biology and biomedical ontologies are useful for materials science research, and researchers have been inspired by these developments to develop materials science ontologies [7,11,17]. Related are nascent efforts developing shared metadata and ontology infrastructures for materials science.…”
Section: Ontologies: Shared Infrastructure and Knowledge Extraction A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, existing ontology infrastructure and knowledge extraction approaches are applicable to materials science. In fact, biology and biomedical ontologies are useful for materials science research, and researchers have been inspired by these developments to develop materials science ontologies [7,11,17]. Related are nascent efforts developing shared metadata and ontology infrastructures for materials science.…”
Section: Ontologies: Shared Infrastructure and Knowledge Extraction A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers J. Greenberg et al compare four open source algorithms for keyword extraction, RAKE, Tagger, Kea, and Maui [12]. According to their experiments, RAKE produce 98.57% unique words (69 of 70 unique words of 70 extracted words).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%