1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.53.3920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold corrections in orbifold models and superstring unification of gauge interactions

Abstract: The string one loop renormalization of the gauge coupling constants is examined in abelian orbifold models. The contributions to string threshold corrections independent of the compactification moduli fields are evaluated numerically for several representative examples of orbifold models. We consider cases with standard and non-standard embeddings as well as cases with discrete Wilson lines background fields which match reasonably well with low energy phenomenology. The gap separating the observed grand unifie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the mechanisms that give rise to large threshold corrections may not be realizable or mutually consistent with the mechanisms that give rise to other desirable phenomenological features such as the appearance of N = 1 spacetime supersymmetry or three generations. Many previous calculations of the threshold corrections have been performed for various types of orbifold or free-fermionic models [19,82,62,83,74], but in most cases such models were typically not phenomenologically realistic. Indeed, the increased complexity of the realistic string models may substantially alter previous expectations.…”
Section: Sizes Of Threshold Corrections: Explicit Calculations In Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the mechanisms that give rise to large threshold corrections may not be realizable or mutually consistent with the mechanisms that give rise to other desirable phenomenological features such as the appearance of N = 1 spacetime supersymmetry or three generations. Many previous calculations of the threshold corrections have been performed for various types of orbifold or free-fermionic models [19,82,62,83,74], but in most cases such models were typically not phenomenologically realistic. Indeed, the increased complexity of the realistic string models may substantially alter previous expectations.…”
Section: Sizes Of Threshold Corrections: Explicit Calculations In Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a simple-minded explanation for the standard model gauge coupling constant unification, as being solely due to heavy threshold corrections is ruled out. The new revised results leave the initial conclusions [20,21] unchanged. The scenarios for perturbative string theory unification appealing to the combined effects of affine algebra levels, anomalous U(1) factor and enhanced threshold corrections from large compactification volumes should continue to provide a viable alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies of threshold corrections using solvable models of string vacua have attempted to justify a decomposition of this type [21]. In this section, we shall pursue the effort started in our previous paper [20] with the purpose of updating the numerical results reported there for the gauge coupling constants by use of the more complete formalism presented in the previous section. We perform numerical calculations for the following selection of 16 abelian orbifold models: (i) The seven standard embedding Z N orbifolds described for N = 3, 4, 6, by the internal shift vectors, Nv i = (1, 1, −2); for N = 7, 8, by Nv i = (1, 2, −3); and for N = 12 by Nv i = (1, 4, −5); (ii) Four non-standard embedding models described by the gauge sector shifts, (NV I )(NV ′ I ) = (1120 5 )(1120 5 ) ′ , (110 6 )(20 7 ) ′ , (1 4 20 3 )(20 7 ) ′ , for Z 3 , and (1120 5 )(220 6 ) ′ for Z 4 ; (iii) Three non-standard embedding Z 3 models with two discrete Wilson lines, due to Ibáñez et al, [69] and Kim and Kim [70].…”
Section: Quadratic Order Gauge and Gravitational Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations