The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2014
DOI: 10.1530/endoabs.36.p78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three year experience of a national interdisciplinary initiative to improve outcomes for children with hypothalamic pituitary axis tumours (HPATs) using multi-site videoconferencing for decision making on Behalf of the UK HPAT Interest Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six independent audits that reviewed data from 1973 to 2011 were undertaken at three tertiary centres in the UK to evaluate the management of children with craniopharyngioma (16). Since 2010, the three centres Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH), Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital (GOSH) and Alder Hey Children's Hospital (AHCH) have participated in a national hypothalamic-pituitary axis tumour (HPAT) multiprofessional discussion forum to share decision making and improve care (17). Meta-data from these six audits were obtained and retrospectively analysed (Table 1).…”
Section: Patient Cohorts and Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six independent audits that reviewed data from 1973 to 2011 were undertaken at three tertiary centres in the UK to evaluate the management of children with craniopharyngioma (16). Since 2010, the three centres Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (RMCH), Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital (GOSH) and Alder Hey Children's Hospital (AHCH) have participated in a national hypothalamic-pituitary axis tumour (HPAT) multiprofessional discussion forum to share decision making and improve care (17). Meta-data from these six audits were obtained and retrospectively analysed (Table 1).…”
Section: Patient Cohorts and Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%