2021
DOI: 10.1002/gamm.202100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three ways to solve partial differential equations with neural networks — A review

Abstract: Neural networks are increasingly used to construct numerical solution methods for partial differential equations. In this expository review, we introduce and contrast three important recent approaches attractive in their simplicity and their suitability for high‐dimensional problems: physics‐informed neural networks, methods based on the Feynman–Kac formula and methods based on the solution of backward stochastic differential equations. The article is accompanied by a suite of expository software in the form o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various review papers involving PINN have been published. About the potentials, limitations and applications for forward and inverse problems (Karniadakis et al, 2021) or a comparison with other ML techniques (Blechschmidt and Ernst, 2021). An introductory course on PINNs that covers the fundamentals of Machine Learning and Neural Networks can be found from Kollmannsberger et al (2021).…”
Section: What Are Pinnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various review papers involving PINN have been published. About the potentials, limitations and applications for forward and inverse problems (Karniadakis et al, 2021) or a comparison with other ML techniques (Blechschmidt and Ernst, 2021). An introductory course on PINNs that covers the fundamentals of Machine Learning and Neural Networks can be found from Kollmannsberger et al (2021).…”
Section: What Are Pinnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, dealing with such high dimensional-complex systems are not exempt from the course of dimensionality, which Bellman first described in the context of optimal control problems (Bellman, 1966). However, machine learning-based algorithms are promising for solving PDEs (Blechschmidt and Ernst, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many algorithms can be interpreted as solving an optimization problems or fixed-point computations and can therefore be improved with amortized optimization, it is also fruitful to use learning to improve algorithms that have nothing to do with optimization. Some key starting references in this space include data-driven algorithm design (Balcan, 2020), learning to prune (Alabi et al, 2019), learning solutions to differential equations Poli et al, 2020;Karniadakis et al, 2021;Kovachki et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021b;Blechschmidt and Ernst, 2021;Marwah et al, 2021;Berto et al, 2021) learning simulators for physics (Grzeszczuk et al, 1998;Ladickỳ et al, 2015;He et al, 2019;Sanchez-Gonzalez et al, 2020;Wiewel et al, 2019;Usman et al, 2021;Vinuesa and Brunton, 2021), and learning for symbolic math (Lample and Charton, 2019;Charton, 2021;Drori et al, 2021;d'Ascoli et al, 2022) Salimans andHo (2022) progressively amortizes a sampling process for diffusion models.…”
Section: Learning-augmented and Amortized Algorithms Beyond Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of machine learning were shown to be particularly effective for identifying the principal properties of the phenomena (for example, physical, economic, or social), which are stochastic by nature or contain some hidden parameters [1,2]. ML is also successfully used to solve complex problems of computational mathematics, for example, for simulation of dynamical systems [3], solution of ordinary, partial, or stochastic differential equations [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%