2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001140050007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Ways To Be a Saber-Toothed Cat

Abstract: Saber-toothed carnivores, until now, have been divided into two groups: scimitar-toothed cats with shorter, coarsely serrated canines coupled with long legs for fast running, and dirk-toothed cats with more elongate, finely serrated canines coupled to short legs built for power rather than speed. In the Pleistocene of North America, as in Europe, the scimitar-cat was Homotherium; the North American dirk-tooth was Smilodon. We now describe a new sabercat from the Early Pleistocene of Florida, combining the scim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Homotherium ischyrus, H. johnstoni, H. crenatidens, and H. problematicus, as well as Xenosmilus hodsonae and H. hadarensis, all have anteriorly unpocketed masseteric fossa (Fabrini, 1890;Merriam, 1905;Ballesio, 1963;Collings, 1972;Martin et al, 2000), as in H. venezuelensis. In H. latidens and H. serum, however, the anterior part of the masseteric fossa is pocketed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homotherium ischyrus, H. johnstoni, H. crenatidens, and H. problematicus, as well as Xenosmilus hodsonae and H. hadarensis, all have anteriorly unpocketed masseteric fossa (Fabrini, 1890;Merriam, 1905;Ballesio, 1963;Collings, 1972;Martin et al, 2000), as in H. venezuelensis. In H. latidens and H. serum, however, the anterior part of the masseteric fossa is pocketed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Homotherium and Xenosmilus also share the following features: p4 with three well developed cusps; the lower carnassials do not have a talonid; in the upper carnassials the protocone is fused with the tooth, and the protocone root disappears; the metastyle and parastyle blades are of equal size (Meade, 1961). Xenosmilus differs from Homotherium in the following features: p3 is absent; narrower frontals; temporal fossa and sagittal crest are elongated; limbs are shortened and robust (Martin et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of the shortlimbed homotheriin genus Xenosmilus in Pleistocene deposits in Florida (Martin et al, 2000) has provided a clear example of a machairodontine combining scimitar-like canines with an extremely robust skeleton, showing that these felids had considerable evolutionary plasticity and were not constrained by a rigid ecomorph model. The Oligocene nimravid Dinictis is also poorly characterised as a scimitar-tooth (Scott & Jepsen, 1936) because its upper canines, while not as high-crowned as those of other nimravids such as Hoplophoneus or Eusmilus, were neither exceptionally flattened nor coarsely crenulated and its limbs, while relatively gracile, had remarkably short, probably semi-plantigrade feet very different from the long, digitigrade feet of Neogene felids such as Homotherium.…”
Section: Hypotheses About Sabre-tooth Ecomorphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otros ca-racteres que lo diferencian de este género son: porción distal de la fíbula no recurvada; diáfisis del fémur curvada dorsoventralmente; tubércu-los presentes en la cara caudal de la extremidad distal no expandidos en sentido caudal más allá de la articulación; astrágalo con un surco más ancho entre las carillas articulares para el calcá-neo. Martin et al, posee miembros cortos y robustos, y un tamaño simi-lar a S. populator y S. fatalis (Martin et al, 2000). Este género fue descrito recientemente y es co-nocido a partir de 2 ejemplares recolectados en USA (Martin et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discusionunclassified
“…Martin et al, posee miembros cortos y robustos, y un tamaño simi-lar a S. populator y S. fatalis (Martin et al, 2000). Este género fue descrito recientemente y es co-nocido a partir de 2 ejemplares recolectados en USA (Martin et al, 2000). Lamentablemente, el postcráneo de este taxón sólo fue descrito y figu-rado someramente, por lo que es difícil compa-rarlo con el MACN Pv 6802.…”
Section: Discusionunclassified