Three-way decision for probabilistic linguistic conflict analysis via compounded risk preference

Wang, Tianxing; Huang, Bing; Li, Huaxiong; Liu, Dun; Yu, Hong

doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.067

Cited by 16 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Suo et al [12] studied a three-way conflict analysis model to deal with incomplete three-valued situation tables. Furthermore, since psychological factors and risk attitudes of agents may affect the results of conflict analysis, Wang et al [13] proposed a compound risk preference model for three-way decision based on different types of risk preferences.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resolving Agent Conflicts Using Enhanced Uncertainty Modeling Tools for Intelligent Decision Making

Zhai,

Jia,

2023

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflict analysis in intelligent decision making has received increasing attention in recent years. However, few researchers have analyzed conflicts by considering trustworthiness from the perspective of common agreement and common opposition. Since L-fuzzy three-way concept lattice is able to describe both the attributes that objects commonly possess and the attributes that objects commonly do not possess, this paper introduces an L-fuzzy three-way concept lattice to capture the issues on which agents commonly agree and the issues which they commonly oppose, and proposes a hybrid conflict analysis model. In order to resolve conflicts identified by the proposed model, we formulate the problem as a knapsack problem and propose a method for selecting the optimal attitude change strategy. This strategy takes into account the associated costs and aims to provide the decision maker with the most favorable decision in terms of resolving conflicts and reaching consensus. To validate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model, a case study is conducted, providing evidence of the model’s efficacy and viability in resolving conflicts.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%