1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80507-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Transmembrane Conformations and Sequence-Dependent Displacement of the S4 Domain in Shaker K + Channel Gating

Abstract: We have acquired structural evidence that two components evident previously in the depolarization-evoked gating currents from voltage-gated Shaker K+ channels have their origin in sequential, two-step outward movements of the S4 protein segments. A point mutation greatly destabilizes the "fully retracted" state of S4 transmembrane translocation, causing instead an intermediate state to predominate at resting potentials. This state is distinguishable topologically and fluorometrically. That a point mutation eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
205
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
26
205
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The modification was assayed functionally in two-electrode voltage-clamped oocytes, as described previously (Larsson et al 1996; Baker et al 1998). The applications of the methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents were computer controlled, and the MTS reagents were applied either at −80 mV (closed state; S4 in the deactivated state) or at 0 mV or +40 mV depending on the channel type (open/inactivated state; S4 in the activated state).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modification was assayed functionally in two-electrode voltage-clamped oocytes, as described previously (Larsson et al 1996; Baker et al 1998). The applications of the methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents were computer controlled, and the MTS reagents were applied either at −80 mV (closed state; S4 in the deactivated state) or at 0 mV or +40 mV depending on the channel type (open/inactivated state; S4 in the activated state).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cysteine accessibility studies suggest that the positive charges of S4 are either buried in the membrane or in the cytosol when the membrane is held at a hyperpolarized potential, and, in response to a depolarizing voltage pulse, the S4 charges move outward and exposes its three most external charges into the extracellular solution (Larsson et al 1996; Yang et al 1996; Yusaf et al 1996; Baker et al 1998; for review see Keynes and Elinder 1999). S4 is suggested to undergo a large-scale movement during activation of the channels, either a 180° rotation (Papazian and Bezanilla 1997; Cha et al 1999; Glauner et al 1999) or a helical screw motion with both a 180° rotation and a translational motion of 13.5 Å (Catterall 1986; Guy and Seetharamulu 1986; Glauner et al 1999; Keynes and Elinder 1999; Gandhi et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the main evidence for the existence of outward movement of the S4 of potassium channels. 49,[57][58][59][60][61] The rest of the transmembrane domains seem to remain mostly static as the S4 moves, providing a physical and electrostatic scaffold. 62,63 Given that the rest of the VSD remains static, as the charged residues in S4 move, they traverse its central portion, which contains an aromatic residue that has been dubbed the charge transfer center.…”
Section: Molecular Mechanism Of Voltage Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the four segments, S4 plays a pivotal role. When the membrane is depolarized, it moves out of the membrane, thereby carrying its charged residues (arginine and lysine), known as gating charges, across the membrane electric field (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). It is this movement that appears to trigger the opening of the activation gates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused our attention on this residue because it occupies a critical position in the channel. It is located within the bilayer yet close to the extracellular boundary (11,12,14,15). This means that when S4 moves out this residue is expected to sever all interactions with the neighboring membrane embedded segments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%