2023
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.3060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐time scale multi‐objective optimal PID control with filter design

Abstract: This paper presents the design of a multi-objective PID (proportional, integral, and derivative) controller in three-time scales for a system with load disturbances and sensor noise. The key to this design method is to divide the problem into three-time scales by following a singular perturbation approach, which allows for the optimization of fewer parameters in each time scale instead of all the three PID gains at once, hence less computation and design effort. The optimization objectives are the minimization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engineers have long pursued various control methods in their efforts to achieve automatic FGBC. These include optimal PID control [19], model predictive control (MPC) [20], dynamic matrix control (DMC) [21], internal model control (IMC) [22], and Smith estimated control [23]. However, achieving automatic FGBC has remained a persistent challenge.…”
Section: Flue Gas Baffle Control Of Reheating Steam Temperature Of Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineers have long pursued various control methods in their efforts to achieve automatic FGBC. These include optimal PID control [19], model predictive control (MPC) [20], dynamic matrix control (DMC) [21], internal model control (IMC) [22], and Smith estimated control [23]. However, achieving automatic FGBC has remained a persistent challenge.…”
Section: Flue Gas Baffle Control Of Reheating Steam Temperature Of Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unknown parameters   ,   ,   ,   ,   , and   in Equations ( 21) and (22) need to be determined. The unknowns are determined from Equations ( 23)- (28) where 𝛼 =…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of FOPID controllers is reported in [20,21], where the controller parameters are determined with the teaching-learning optimization method and the Harris Hawks optimization algorithm, respectively. A multi-objective PID controller and a novel technique for maintaining the height of a QTS by reducing loop interactions with a feedback linearization controller are described in [22,23]. An adaptive SM controller for a QTS, considering disturbances and parametric uncertainties for robustness analysis is described in [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%