2014
DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2014.918879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Theories of Religious Activism and Violence: Social Movements, Fundamentalists, and Apocalyptic Warriors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In her analysis of different types of religious activism, Gregg (2016) argues that religious activists are either (i) involved in social movements which challenge social practices and government policies, (ii) fundamentalists who defends specific interpretations and practices of the faith, or (iii) apocalyptic warriors who look to hasten the apocalypse. However, like much of the scholarship on "religiously-motivated action", this analysis has been framed through Abrahamic traditions, promoting a clear separation between the religious and the secular realms as pointed out by Gunning and Jackson (2011, p. 370), who highlight how the idea of "religious terrorism" can be traced back to an article by David Rapoport (1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her analysis of different types of religious activism, Gregg (2016) argues that religious activists are either (i) involved in social movements which challenge social practices and government policies, (ii) fundamentalists who defends specific interpretations and practices of the faith, or (iii) apocalyptic warriors who look to hasten the apocalypse. However, like much of the scholarship on "religiously-motivated action", this analysis has been framed through Abrahamic traditions, promoting a clear separation between the religious and the secular realms as pointed out by Gunning and Jackson (2011, p. 370), who highlight how the idea of "religious terrorism" can be traced back to an article by David Rapoport (1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, religious fundamentalism is defined as a defensive reaction to modernization and secularization (Almond, Sivan, and Appleby 1995, Emerson and Hartman 2006). Fundamentalists believe that secularism forces religion to the margins of society and brings about moral decay (Gregg 2014:8). In this perspective, God's rule is favored over humanity's rule and religion is understood as the expression of a divine order (Tibi 1998:20).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the trajectory is that religious members often believe that leaders are right, and any criticism of these leaders is a direct attack by evil. Gregg (2016) elaborates:…”
Section: Seven Angels Ministry Mental Incapacitation and Mafia Tendenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%