1988
DOI: 10.1080/13854048808520107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three tests of attention and rapid information processing: An extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Z-scores for the neuropsychological domains and measures were computed based on standardized norms adjusted for age [Stroop (Golden, 1978), Short Categories (Wetzel & Boll, 1987), PASAT (Stuss et al, 1988), Block Design (Wechsler, 1997), and Rey (Denman, 1987)], years of education [AMNART (Grober & Sliwinski, 1991)], age and years of education [Symbol Digit Modalities (Smith, 1982), MicroCog (Powell et al, 1993)], and age, gender, and years of education [(Trails A and B (Heaton et al, 1991), COWAT (Ruff et al, 1996)]. The Stroop, Symbol Digit Modalities, and the MicroCog test norms are not specific to gender, since gender did not significantly affect scores in the normative samples (Golden, 1978;Powell et al, 1993;Smith, 1982).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z-scores for the neuropsychological domains and measures were computed based on standardized norms adjusted for age [Stroop (Golden, 1978), Short Categories (Wetzel & Boll, 1987), PASAT (Stuss et al, 1988), Block Design (Wechsler, 1997), and Rey (Denman, 1987)], years of education [AMNART (Grober & Sliwinski, 1991)], age and years of education [Symbol Digit Modalities (Smith, 1982), MicroCog (Powell et al, 1993)], and age, gender, and years of education [(Trails A and B (Heaton et al, 1991), COWAT (Ruff et al, 1996)]. The Stroop, Symbol Digit Modalities, and the MicroCog test norms are not specific to gender, since gender did not significantly affect scores in the normative samples (Golden, 1978;Powell et al, 1993;Smith, 1982).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw scores from the neuropsychological tests were transformed into T-scores using published normative data for specific tests (45)(46)(47). This procedure allows comparison with samples of normal subjects that have similar demographic features (45)(46)(47). Previous studies have suggested that a T-score below 40 demonstrates sensitivity and specificity for the definition of impairment across brain-damaged and normal subjects, for a majority of the tests (45).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific tests included in each of these domains are listed in Table 1 ( [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Raw scores from the neuropsychological tests were transformed into T-scores using published normative data for specific tests (45)(46)(47). This procedure allows comparison with samples of normal subjects that have similar demographic features (45)(46)(47).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z-scores for the neuropsychological domains and measures were computed based on standardized norms adjusted for age [Stroop (Golden, 1978), Short Categories (Wetzel and Boll, 1987), PASAT (Stuss et al, 1988), Block Design (Wechsler, 1997), and Rey (Denman, 1987)], years of education [AMNART (Schwartz and Saffran, 1987)], age and years of education [Symbol Digit Modalities (Smith, 1982), MicroCog (Powell et al, 1993)], and age, gender, and years of education [(Trails A and B (Heaton et al, 1991), COWAT (Ruff et al, 1996)]. The Stroop, Symbol Digit Modalities, and the MicroCog test norms are not specific to gender, since gender did not significantly affect scores in the normative samples (Golden, 1978;Powell et al, 1993;Smith, 1982).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%