Abstract:BackgroundInactivating mutations in the MLH1 DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene underlie 42% of Lynch syndrome (LS) cases. LS is a cancer predisposition causing early onset colorectal and endometrial cancer. Nonsense and frameshift alterations unambiguously cause LS. The phenotype of missense mutations that only alter a single amino acid is often unclear. These variants of uncertain significance (VUS) hinder LS diagnosis and family screening and therefore functional tests are urgently needed. We developed a functi… Show more
“…Thus, germline testing should be performed based on MMR‐IHC results or MSI status (Figure 1). 48 Also, many functional assays have been developed to analyze VUS 75,79 . In addition, long‐read sequencing has shown promising results in LS diagnosis because of its advantages in the detection of unknown MMR variants, epigenetic modifications of MMR genes and pseudogenes, such as PMS2 80 …”
Section: Screening and Diagnosis Of Ls‐ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 VUS refers to the changes in the sequences of MMR gene that are known to only alter a single amino acid, which is not specifically known to cause LS. 75 VUS accounts for 31%, 28%, 47% and 26% of all MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations, respectively. 77 VUS results in challenges in LS diagnosis, and there is no established management for patients with VUS because its pathological functions are unknown.…”
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. LS‐associated endometrial cancer (LS‐EC) is the most common extraintestinal sentinel cancer caused by germline PVs in MMR genes, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. The clinicopathologic features of LS‐EC include early age of onset, lower body mass index (BMI), endometrioid carcinoma and lower uterine segment involvement. There has been significant progress in screening, diagnosis, surveillance, prevention and treatment of LS‐EC. Many studies support universal screening for LS among patients with EC. Screening mainly involves a combination of traditional clinical criteria and molecular techniques, including MMR‐immunohistochemistry (MMR‐IHC), microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, MLH1 promoter methylation testing and gene sequencing. The effectiveness of endometrial biopsy and transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) for clinical monitoring of asymptomatic women with LS are uncertain yet. Preventive strategies include hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (BSO) as well as chemoprophylaxis using exogenous progestin or aspirin. Recent research has revealed the benefits of immunotherapy for LS‐EC. The NCCN guidelines recommend pembrolizumab and nivolumab for treating patients with advanced or recurrent microsatellite instability‐high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) EC.
“…Thus, germline testing should be performed based on MMR‐IHC results or MSI status (Figure 1). 48 Also, many functional assays have been developed to analyze VUS 75,79 . In addition, long‐read sequencing has shown promising results in LS diagnosis because of its advantages in the detection of unknown MMR variants, epigenetic modifications of MMR genes and pseudogenes, such as PMS2 80 …”
Section: Screening and Diagnosis Of Ls‐ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 VUS refers to the changes in the sequences of MMR gene that are known to only alter a single amino acid, which is not specifically known to cause LS. 75 VUS accounts for 31%, 28%, 47% and 26% of all MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations, respectively. 77 VUS results in challenges in LS diagnosis, and there is no established management for patients with VUS because its pathological functions are unknown.…”
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. LS‐associated endometrial cancer (LS‐EC) is the most common extraintestinal sentinel cancer caused by germline PVs in MMR genes, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. The clinicopathologic features of LS‐EC include early age of onset, lower body mass index (BMI), endometrioid carcinoma and lower uterine segment involvement. There has been significant progress in screening, diagnosis, surveillance, prevention and treatment of LS‐EC. Many studies support universal screening for LS among patients with EC. Screening mainly involves a combination of traditional clinical criteria and molecular techniques, including MMR‐immunohistochemistry (MMR‐IHC), microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, MLH1 promoter methylation testing and gene sequencing. The effectiveness of endometrial biopsy and transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) for clinical monitoring of asymptomatic women with LS are uncertain yet. Preventive strategies include hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (BSO) as well as chemoprophylaxis using exogenous progestin or aspirin. Recent research has revealed the benefits of immunotherapy for LS‐EC. The NCCN guidelines recommend pembrolizumab and nivolumab for treating patients with advanced or recurrent microsatellite instability‐high (MSI‐H)/mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) EC.
“…However, the lack of additional planned and unforeseen mutations at the target site (which is adherent to CRISPR/Cas) makes LMO technology especially useful for direct phenotypic assessment of variants identified in disease-related genes. As a proof-of-concept we have demonstrated this approach for the classification of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) identified in the MMR genes MSH2 [ 9 ], MSH6 [ 10 ] and MLH1 [ 11 ]. While identification of pathogenic MMR gene variants was based on their acquired resistance to a methylating compound, the readout in other VUS screens could be based on more subtle and less binary phenotypic changes that can be assessed by flow cytometry, high-throughput microscopy or integrative single cell analyses [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting chromosomal DNA during replication has proven to be highly effective for multiplex genome engineering in simple prokaryotic and eukaryotic model organisms like Escherichia coli [4][5][6] and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [7,8]. In addition, we have demonstrated the applicability of this technology in mammalian cells by setting up screens that enable the classification of Lynch syndrome-associated variants of uncertain clinical significance in MSH2, MSH6 and MLH1 [9][10][11].…”
Through transfection of short single-stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ssODNs) small genomic alterations can be introduced into mammalian cells with high precision. ssODNs integrate into the genome during DNA replication, but the resulting heteroduplex is prone to detection by DNA mismatch repair (MMR), which prevents effective gene modification. We have previously demonstrated that the suppressive action of MMR can be avoided when the mismatching nucleotide in the ssODN is a locked nucleic acid (LNA). Here, we reveal that LNA-modified ssODNs (LMOs) are not integrated as intact entities in mammalian cells, but are severely truncated before and after target hybridization. We found that single additional (non-LNA-modified) mutations in the 5’-arm of LMOs influenced targeting efficiencies negatively and activated the MMR pathway. In contrast, additional mutations in the 3’-arm did not affect targeting efficiencies and were not subject to MMR. Even more strikingly, homology in the 3’-arm was largely dispensable for effective targeting, suggestive for extensive 3’-end trimming. We propose a refined model for LMO-directed gene modification in mammalian cells that includes LMO degradation.
“…Predisposing variants in PMS2 confer a low prevalence of cancer due to the protein's genetic redundancy (11%–20% lifetime colorectal cancer risk by age 70) (Senter et al, 2008; ten Broeke et al, 2015). The current clinically focused approach of variant classification, therefore, is often underpowered to classify PMS2 VUS, and 98% of PMS2 missense variants (1490/1521) remain unclassified (Class 3, VUS) in the ClinVar database (Accessed, August 19, 2021) (Landrum et al, 2018). Consequently, personalized healthcare for carriers and affected relatives cannot be implemented.…”
The large majority of germline alterations identified in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene PMS2, a low‐penetrance gene for the cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome, represent variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The inability to classify most VUS interferes with personalized healthcare. The complete in vitro MMR activity (CIMRA) assay, that only requires sequence information on the VUS, provides a functional analysis‐based quantitative tool to improve the classification of VUS in MMR proteins. To derive a formula that translates CIMRA assay results into the odds of pathogenicity (OddsPath) for VUS in PMS2 we used a set of clinically classified PMS2 variants supplemented by inactivating variants that were generated by an in cellulo genetic screen, as proxies for cancer‐predisposing variants. Validation of this OddsPath revealed high predictive values for benign and predisposing PMS2 VUS. We conclude that the OddsPath provides an integral metric that, following the other, higher penetrance, MMR proteins MSH2, MSH6 and MLH1 can be incorporated as strong evidence type into the upcoming criteria for MMR gene VUS classification of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.