2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2442053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three States of Fiscal Multipliers in a Small Open Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the implied multipliers do increase with the share of non-Ricardian households, consumption multipliers never turn positive, while the output multipliers remain well below 1. This finding is consistent with evidence for open economies (see, for example, Forni et al 2009;Naitram et al 2015;Ratto et al 2006;Sin 2016). Additionally, the introduction of additional frictions in the model set-up in the form of labour and consumption taxes (which respond to debt) serves to dampen the effect of government spending increases.…”
Section: Consumption Multipliers and Non-ricardian Householdssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While the implied multipliers do increase with the share of non-Ricardian households, consumption multipliers never turn positive, while the output multipliers remain well below 1. This finding is consistent with evidence for open economies (see, for example, Forni et al 2009;Naitram et al 2015;Ratto et al 2006;Sin 2016). Additionally, the introduction of additional frictions in the model set-up in the form of labour and consumption taxes (which respond to debt) serves to dampen the effect of government spending increases.…”
Section: Consumption Multipliers and Non-ricardian Householdssupporting
confidence: 88%