2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2634-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-stage treatment protocol for recalcitrant distal femoral nonunion

Abstract: Although the current study involved only a small number of patients and the intervention comprised three stages, we believe that such a protocol may be a valuable alternative for the treatment of recalcitrant distal femoral nonunion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was a retrospective study of the medical records and radiographs of 15 consecutive patients who underwent an intervention for aseptic recalcitrant humeral shaft nonunion between May 2010 and August 2017 in the department of orthopedic trauma, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi’an, China (Table 1 ). The inclusion criteria were: 1) patients who received one or more surgical revisions for nonunion of the humeral shaft at least 9 months ago, and the fracture had shown no visible progressive signs of healing for 3 months [ 14 ]; 2) pain and dysfunction requiring intervention; 3) a revision procedure comprising double plate fixation in combination with autogenous iliac crest bone grafting. The exclusion criteria were single plate fixation, internal nailing, external fixation, or infected nonunion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a retrospective study of the medical records and radiographs of 15 consecutive patients who underwent an intervention for aseptic recalcitrant humeral shaft nonunion between May 2010 and August 2017 in the department of orthopedic trauma, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi’an, China (Table 1 ). The inclusion criteria were: 1) patients who received one or more surgical revisions for nonunion of the humeral shaft at least 9 months ago, and the fracture had shown no visible progressive signs of healing for 3 months [ 14 ]; 2) pain and dysfunction requiring intervention; 3) a revision procedure comprising double plate fixation in combination with autogenous iliac crest bone grafting. The exclusion criteria were single plate fixation, internal nailing, external fixation, or infected nonunion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a retrospective study of the medical records and radiographs of 15 consecutive patients who underwent an intervention for aseptic recalcitrant humeral shaft nonunion between May 2010 and August 2017 in the department of orthopedic trauma, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, China (Table 1). The inclusion criteria were: 1) patients who received one or more surgical revisions for nonunion of the humeral shaft at least 9 months ago, and the fracture had shown no visible progressive signs of healing for 3 months [14]; 2) pain and dysfunction requiring intervention; 3) a revision procedure comprising double plate xation in combination with autogenous iliac crest bone grafting. The exclusion criteria were single plate xation, internal nailing, external xation, or infected nonunion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hong Hui Hospital, Xi' an Jiaotong University. The inclusion criteria were follow: 1) skeletally mature (18-85 years) patients satis ed diagnosis of recalcitrant nonunion, which was a patient had already received surgical revision at least once for nonunion, and a minimum of 9 months has elapsed since last treatment and the fracture shows no visibly progressive signs of healing for 3 months [13]; 2) patients suffered pain and weakness in the upper limb need intervention; 3) patients with a revision procedure of double plate xation in combination with autogenous iliac crest bone grafting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%